Only once in his tenure as a headcaoch has Dick produced a top 10 offense.
Although I like his basic fundamental approach I sometimes wonder if we will have an O that will be good enough produce a superbowl.
This is his 3rd year and yet we've been surpassed offensively by teams with 1st time/ rookie coaches that have rookie qb's calling the shots. Ravens under MUlarkey are doing better than us offensively.
HOw about the texans?
On our first FG yesterday all I could think was "WTH?" After watching Chad score a TD on a play action, our run at the goal line was as UNIMAGINATIVE as can be. I don't expect us to run gadget plays every game but can we at least have offensive X's and O's that can fool a D?
Turk has done a wonderful job to this point in running a ball control type of offense. I do however wonder at some point if we will have an O that can impose itself on a D. This ball control type of O is designed to keep the game close and hopefully win the game in the 4th qtr. Our O isn't designed to bail out the D should they struggle.
In Dicks 3 years here, he hasn't produced a potent running game either.
We are only one step ahead offensively of a team who's last start prior to coming in to replace the injured starter was back in HS. A good X and O mind can do that to a team thats qb'd by Cassel.
I know it's Turks first year as OC but it's hard to make excuses especially when you have other teams playing better than we are offensively with rookie coaches.
We have an OL and a rb tandem that looks great on paper yet we can't produce anything but a mediocre at best running game.
Our passing game isn't good enough to bail out the running game and vice-versa.
We have a qb that has all the tools and a brain that could most likely run any offense in this league. I hate to see his abilties limited by conservative playcalling.
Will we at some point have anything top 10 offensively?
Although I like his basic fundamental approach I sometimes wonder if we will have an O that will be good enough produce a superbowl.
This is his 3rd year and yet we've been surpassed offensively by teams with 1st time/ rookie coaches that have rookie qb's calling the shots. Ravens under MUlarkey are doing better than us offensively.
HOw about the texans?
On our first FG yesterday all I could think was "WTH?" After watching Chad score a TD on a play action, our run at the goal line was as UNIMAGINATIVE as can be. I don't expect us to run gadget plays every game but can we at least have offensive X's and O's that can fool a D?
Turk has done a wonderful job to this point in running a ball control type of offense. I do however wonder at some point if we will have an O that can impose itself on a D. This ball control type of O is designed to keep the game close and hopefully win the game in the 4th qtr. Our O isn't designed to bail out the D should they struggle.
In Dicks 3 years here, he hasn't produced a potent running game either.
We are only one step ahead offensively of a team who's last start prior to coming in to replace the injured starter was back in HS. A good X and O mind can do that to a team thats qb'd by Cassel.
I know it's Turks first year as OC but it's hard to make excuses especially when you have other teams playing better than we are offensively with rookie coaches.
We have an OL and a rb tandem that looks great on paper yet we can't produce anything but a mediocre at best running game.
Our passing game isn't good enough to bail out the running game and vice-versa.
We have a qb that has all the tools and a brain that could most likely run any offense in this league. I hate to see his abilties limited by conservative playcalling.
Will we at some point have anything top 10 offensively?
Comment