It really bothers me that people consistently say that we'll lose this weekend because Belichick is a better coach than Jauron.
I agree with the premise, that Belichick IS a better coach. But since when does the better coach always win? Is rookie coach Tony Sparano better than Belichick, since his team slaughtered the Pats at home? No.
Do the Pats have a psychological edge? Yes. But I just don't understand why people say that we'll lose simply because Jauron isn't as good a coach as Belichick. If we lose, it will be for more reasons than that, like turnovers.
I honestly believe that Jauron hasn't necessarily cost us the last couple of games. It's true that he made some bad challenges and maybe some bad decisions (going for it on the 4th and 1, etc.), but I didn't see any that cost us the game necessarily. The players had really bad execution and terrible mistakes.
I agree with the premise, that Belichick IS a better coach. But since when does the better coach always win? Is rookie coach Tony Sparano better than Belichick, since his team slaughtered the Pats at home? No.
Do the Pats have a psychological edge? Yes. But I just don't understand why people say that we'll lose simply because Jauron isn't as good a coach as Belichick. If we lose, it will be for more reasons than that, like turnovers.
I honestly believe that Jauron hasn't necessarily cost us the last couple of games. It's true that he made some bad challenges and maybe some bad decisions (going for it on the 4th and 1, etc.), but I didn't see any that cost us the game necessarily. The players had really bad execution and terrible mistakes.
Comment