Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 4
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 3 4 template Next
  • HHURRICANE
    Registered User
    • Mar 2005
    • 15490
    #1

    Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

    For those who argued that Losman was the "best option" at QB we haven't won a game that he's played in this year. 0-4!!

    He had a 45.7 QB rating yesterday.

    Last week it was a 45.8.

    Do you really believe that you are going to win the last 2 games with a QB that had 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks and 6 fumbles (2 lost)??!!!
    Tags: None
    • 👍 1
  • Patti120
    Registered User
    • Aug 2004
    • 2333
    #2
    Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

    HAMDAN!
    • 👍 1

    Comment

    • HHURRICANE
      Registered User
      • Mar 2005
      • 15490
      #3
      Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

      We expect this guy to win us games when his combined QB rating for the last 2 weeks is 45.

      Comment

      • The King
        Without me it's just Awe so
        • Jun 2004
        • 42380
        #4
        Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

        the bright side is if you add his QB Rating over the last two weeks its a 90!
        I remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?"
        "Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet.
        You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times."
        It was all         true what he was saying. And yet, I thought something is brewing inside the head of this Coach.
        He sees something in me, some kind of raw talent that he can         mold. But that's when I felt the handcuffs go on.


        • 👍 1

        Comment

        • HHURRICANE
          Registered User
          • Mar 2005
          • 15490
          #5
          Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

          Originally posted by MBBedard
          the bright side is if you add his QB Rating over the last two weeks its a 90!

          Comment

          • billsfanone
            Majored in Home Economics
            • Sep 2008
            • 4317
            #6
            Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

            He's shown he can win the big game.
            • 👍 2

            Comment

            • Philagape
              WIN NOW
              • Jul 2002
              • 19432
              #7
              Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

              If Trent's regressed, then JP's reverted back to fetal stage.
              "It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther

              "Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill

              2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
              2004 BZ Big Money League Champion
              • 👍 1

              Comment

              • acehole
                Registered User
                • Jan 2006
                • 4877
                #8
                Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

                No and I hope we dont....I want a better draft spot.

                It is time we draft 2 guards and a centet worth a dam.

                We can run the ball at will and wont even need to pass.

                Then we can get a replacement for Ko Simpson.



                Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                For those who argued that Losman was the "best option" at QB we haven't won a game that he's played in this year. 0-4!!

                He had a 45.7 QB rating yesterday.

                Last week it was a 45.8.

                Do you really believe that you are going to win the last 2 games with a QB that had 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks and 6 fumbles (2 lost)??!!!
                Hated by the stupid..
                Loved by their moms.

                Comment

                • acehole
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 4877
                  #9
                  Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

                  Funny how Trent never broke the 11th rated passer on the year.

                  And we are still focused on the 2nd string QB who will be gone next year.


                  Hate runs deep in this one.


                  Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                  For those who argued that Losman was the "best option" at QB we haven't won a game that he's played in this year. 0-4!!

                  He had a 45.7 QB rating yesterday.

                  Last week it was a 45.8.

                  Do you really believe that you are going to win the last 2 games with a QB that had 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks and 6 fumbles (2 lost)??!!!
                  Hated by the stupid..
                  Loved by their moms.

                  • 👍 2

                  Comment

                  • HHURRICANE
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 15490
                    #10
                    Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

                    Originally posted by acehole
                    Funny how Trent never broke the 11th rated passer on the year.

                    And we are still focused on the 2nd string QB who will be gone next year.


                    Hate runs deep in this one.
                    You are missing the point. People argued that JP was our "best option" as the #2 QB.

                    The backups job is to not lose games when the starter goes down. We are 0-4 with Losman at the helm.

                    Comment

                    • Mr. Pink
                      Peterman Sucks!
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 35303
                      #11
                      Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

                      What happened to those people who praised Losman for his 100 whatever rating against Arizona and said..."I can't wait to see what he does when he gets full reps?"
                      • 👍 3

                      Comment

                      • ddaryl
                        Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                        • Jan 2005
                        • 10714
                        #12
                        Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

                        Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                        For those who argued that Losman was the "best option" at QB we haven't won a game that he's played in this year. 0-4!!

                        He had a 45.7 QB rating yesterday.

                        Last week it was a 45.8.

                        Do you really believe that you are going to win the last 2 games with a QB that had 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks and 6 fumbles (2 lost)??!!!
                        I was in that camp in the offseason.

                        but NOW or even last week, why play a QB we know for a fact won't be with the team next year.

                        Comment

                        • HHURRICANE
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 15490
                          #13
                          Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

                          Originally posted by ddaryl
                          I was in that camp in the offseason.

                          but NOW or even last week, why play a QB we know for a fact won't be with the team next year.
                          To be clear I vasilated on Losman as the backup as well. Why not start Hamden at this point?

                          Comment

                          • Mr. Pink
                            Peterman Sucks!
                            • Mar 2006
                            • 35303
                            #14
                            Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

                            Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                            To be clear I vasilated on Losman as the backup as well. Why not start Hamden at this point?
                            I was saying two weeks ago you might as well start Hamdan at this point.

                            I got ridiculed.

                            I got told, we're still trying to win games.

                            Really? JP is trying to win games? RIGHT!

                            Comment

                            • HHURRICANE
                              Registered User
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 15490
                              #15
                              Re: Our "best option": 1 TD, 4 INTs, 7 sacks, 6 fumbles.

                              Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                              To be clear I vasilated on Losman as the backup as well. Why not start Hamden at this point?
                              Seriously, how could Hamden do any worse? Look at the thread title. I could do better.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 3 4 template Next
                              Working...
                              X