Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HHURRICANE
    Registered User
    • Mar 2005
    • 15490

    Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

    We are not drafting a QB high. Do I think we will draft a QB? Good possibility depending on how FA goes but it will be in later rounds.

    This QB class is off the table and the FO is high on Edwards.

    I hate when I have to read 80 threads on the Bills taking Tebow or Bradford.
  • DraftBoy
    Administrator
    • Jul 2002
    • 107452

    #2
    Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

    We could take Stafford too, he declared!

    If we draft a QB are you going to quit being a Bills fans the weeks he plays after Edwards gets hurt next season?
    COMING SOON...
    Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

    Comment

    • hydro
      Registered User
      • Oct 2005
      • 20160

      #3
      Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

      Is the FO high on Edwards, or just you?
      BERNIAC!

      Comment

      • realdealryan
        realdealrex
        • Nov 2005
        • 1838

        #4
        Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

        Skipping past 99% of the threads is all part of the offseason here.

        Comment

        • Yasgur's Farm
          Moderator
          • Feb 2005
          • 7091

          #5
          Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

          Originally posted by HHURRICANE
          We are not drafting a QB high.
          WalterFootball rates Tebow as a 4th rounder... Do you consider that a high pick?

          Comment

          • TacklingDummy
            Unreachable Douche
            • Jul 2002
            • 71725

            #6
            Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

            Originally posted by HHURRICANE

            I hate when I have to read 80 threads on the Bills taking Tebow or Bradford.

            Trading Peters is more realistic than the Bills drafting Tebow or Bradford.

            Comment

            • HHURRICANE
              Registered User
              • Mar 2005
              • 15490

              #7
              Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

              Originally posted by hydrosmak
              Is the FO high on Edwards, or just you?
              Edwards gets the same benefit of doubt that Losman got from me. The good news is that his "make or break year" is coming a year earlier than Losman's.

              I don't fall in love with players around here like so many of you do.

              To answer your question form the owner down this FO likes Edwards and thinks he is the real deal.

              Comment

              • TacklingDummy
                Unreachable Douche
                • Jul 2002
                • 71725

                #8
                Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

                Originally posted by HHURRICANE

                I don't fall in love with players around here like so many of you do.
                You were in love with Losman at first until you flip-flopped.

                Comment

                • Jeff1220
                  H to the 12:20
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 6136

                  #9
                  Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

                  Originally posted by TacklingDummy
                  Trading Peters is more realistic than the Bills drafting Tebow or Bradford.
                  Chris Brown made a point to mention this mock draft pick for the Bills at #11 (from http://www.nfldraftblitz.com/mockdrafts.htm )

                  11. Buffalo Bills-Jason Smith, OT-Baylor

                  Bills’ fans have witnessed an amazing metamorphosis of Jason Peters from oversized college Tight End to Pro Bowl Left Tackle. Peters, however, witnessed this as well and would like to be compensated. He will price himself out of Buffalo and the fast-rising Smith will remedy that predicament.

                  While Jason Smith is certainly a talent and a likely first-rounder, 11 may be a bit high. But the take is certainly an interesting one.

                  Comment

                  • ddaryl
                    Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 10714

                    #10
                    Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

                    I completely agree there is less than a 0 chance we take a QB early...

                    Edwards looked pretty good most of the season with a weak stretch in the middle... but he is young and this was his 1st year starting. Plus there were many tangibles in the losing streak including key injuries and the residual concussion effect, and matched up with brutal play from much of the team in general and of course coaching. You have to let a guy have a chance to develope. Drafting a QB early just starts up the controversy game again...

                    Edwards and a top vet QB will make a for a very serviceable tandem next year. If Edwards fails to improve then 2010 would be the year the Bills look to add a top QB IMO...

                    This year we beef up the weak spots at DE OLB backup QB C TE/WR and improve our depth and hope to god our coaches learn to coach

                    Comment

                    • acehole
                      Registered User
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 4876

                      #11
                      Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

                      Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                      We are not drafting a QB high. Do I think we will draft a QB? Good possibility depending on how FA goes but it will be in later rounds.

                      This QB class is off the table and the FO is high on Edwards.

                      I hate when I have to read 80 threads on the Bills taking Tebow or Bradford.
                      What is dillutional is expecting Trent to play a full season.
                      We are discussing the offseason now and all its possibilities.

                      Relax and enjoy.....
                      Hated by the stupid..
                      Loved by their moms.

                      Comment

                      • Jan Reimers
                        Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                        • May 2003
                        • 17353

                        #12
                        Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

                        DE, LB, C, DT, WR, TE, and perhaps G and S, all have higher priority than QB. Let's give Edwards a chance to develop, and put some talent around him to help.
                        Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                        Comment

                        • trapezeus
                          Legendary Zoner
                          • Oct 2004
                          • 19525

                          #13
                          Re: Can we not have dillusional threads regarding QB?!

                          Originally posted by draz54
                          WalterFootball rates Tebow as a 4th rounder... Do you consider that a high pick?
                          for a running QB with less mechanics than JP, yeah, that seems high to me. Tebow is a classic awesome college QB who will not pan out in the NFL.

                          I believe that. but i also won't be surprised if that statement comes back to bite me in the bum like the guy who proclaimed there would never be sound in movies.

                          Comment

                          • DrGraves
                            Registered User
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 2693

                            #14
                            If the thought of drafting...

                            a quarterback with the #11 pick crosses your mind you are insane. I see threads about tebow, bradford, and sanchez. WTF. Maybe Trent is good maybe he sucks, its too late for that. There are a million reasons in this world you can name as to why the bills suck. Putting a heisman qb behind a **** o-line with no tight end either isnt going to help. That offensive line could turn joe montana into jp losman real quick. fix our problems with the team, not the problems with our jersey sales.

                            Comment

                            • bigbub2352
                              Registered User
                              • Feb 2005
                              • 5386

                              #15
                              Re: If the thought of drafting...

                              You cant judge Trent yet to young, and not enough time behind Center, plus something that most forget, his weapons in the passing game is a joke and so is the play calling, not to mentions our over sized over paid OLIne

                              Trent has a WR playing tight end in Josh Reed, a deep threat he nevers throws long to or even 20 yds down feild to in Evans, the rest are ??? like Hardy and johnson, and a glorified punt returner making 4 mil a season in Parrish, throw in a terrible Center and over ratted Oline and what did people expect and that is not even mentioning our horrible play at TE and our horrible clock management and decision making....
                              We need playmakers to add to our Offense not bland 4 yd throws to our Rbs and wrs
                              give trent a TE and a number 2 and lynch and jackson a real FB and gee mite score some pts
                              XTRA CRISPY XTRA SAUCEY

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X