So, I cant see us paying top dollar to anyone. Peppers will command top money.
But if you can spend 7 mill per for a damn G, why cant you spend 8 or even 9 for Peppers?
I was a fan of simply drafting a DE in the 1st round to fix our biggest issue which is pass rush. However, Chris Brown now mentions that none of the top 3 DE's (Orakpo, Brown, Maybin) seem to be good fits for a 4-3. Theres a growing number that agree. So what then? Later in round 1 or beyond for a guy like Jackson or Johnson? Maybe.
What about trading our 1st rounder for Peppers? I can see teams shying away from the big contract and giving up a 1st rounder.
But if we seriously wanted a DE in the 1st round, dont we get that guy in Peppers?
The more specific thought is this:
1) We want a DE in the 1st round considering we cant get Curry and no other OLB is worthy of the 11 pick
2) None of the top 3 DE's are 4-3 fits
3) Peppers is franchised which may happen according to this:
My thought was that trading for him after hes franchised may actually save us money and make it more possible. Why? Well the thought was that if he hits the market in free agency, he will likely go to the highest bidder and teams with no issues in dropping huge money will most likely land him.
However, if he is in a trade situation where a team has to give up a 1st rounder, teams with lots of money but other needs may shy away. Then the highest bidder is the team giving the highest pick. Peppers may take less because there isnt the huge contract out there. We end up spending our 1st on a proven stud DE who can definitely play in the 4-3, and we save some money in landing that star.
Its a a lot to give up for a player, I realize. But were talking about a 14.5 sack guy who needs no development, is a proven star, and perpetual pro-bowler. Would you rather have a unproven rookie DE who may not even fit the scheme? You still will pay pretty hefty dollar to him, look at Harveys contract: 5 years 23 mill.... for an unproven player who may not even fit the scheme
I think this is extremely unlikely. But if were serious about getting better this is an example of how you might do it.
But if you can spend 7 mill per for a damn G, why cant you spend 8 or even 9 for Peppers?
I was a fan of simply drafting a DE in the 1st round to fix our biggest issue which is pass rush. However, Chris Brown now mentions that none of the top 3 DE's (Orakpo, Brown, Maybin) seem to be good fits for a 4-3. Theres a growing number that agree. So what then? Later in round 1 or beyond for a guy like Jackson or Johnson? Maybe.
What about trading our 1st rounder for Peppers? I can see teams shying away from the big contract and giving up a 1st rounder.
But if we seriously wanted a DE in the 1st round, dont we get that guy in Peppers?
The more specific thought is this:
1) We want a DE in the 1st round considering we cant get Curry and no other OLB is worthy of the 11 pick
2) None of the top 3 DE's are 4-3 fits
3) Peppers is franchised which may happen according to this:
My thought was that trading for him after hes franchised may actually save us money and make it more possible. Why? Well the thought was that if he hits the market in free agency, he will likely go to the highest bidder and teams with no issues in dropping huge money will most likely land him.
However, if he is in a trade situation where a team has to give up a 1st rounder, teams with lots of money but other needs may shy away. Then the highest bidder is the team giving the highest pick. Peppers may take less because there isnt the huge contract out there. We end up spending our 1st on a proven stud DE who can definitely play in the 4-3, and we save some money in landing that star.
Its a a lot to give up for a player, I realize. But were talking about a 14.5 sack guy who needs no development, is a proven star, and perpetual pro-bowler. Would you rather have a unproven rookie DE who may not even fit the scheme? You still will pay pretty hefty dollar to him, look at Harveys contract: 5 years 23 mill.... for an unproven player who may not even fit the scheme
I think this is extremely unlikely. But if were serious about getting better this is an example of how you might do it.
Comment