Chambers back

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • ghz in pittsburgh
    Registered User
    • Aug 2004
    • 5861
    #1

    Chambers back

    http://myespn.go.com/blogs/afceast/0-5-123/Bills-stay-busy-as-free-agency-approaches.html


    So far the moves are straightforward: if you perform we want you back, if you don't, bye bye.
    Tags: None
    • 👍 1
  • ddaryl
    Everything I post is sexual inuendo
    • Jan 2005
    • 10714
    #2
    Re: Chambers back

    logical might have been getting chambers signed then releasing Dockery

    but I was surprised that they hadn't gotten this done yet.

    Comment

    • justasportsfan
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 71601
      #3
      Re: Chambers back

      it says on the verge.
      He's Dockery's replacement.
      sacrifice1
      https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

      Comment

      • Forward_Lateral
        Registered User
        • Mar 2004
        • 29897
        #4
        Re: Chambers back

        He better not be Dockery's replacement.
        • 👍 2

        Comment

        • justasportsfan
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 71601
          #5
          Re: Chambers back

          Originally posted by Forward_Lateral
          He better not be Dockery's replacement.
          Peters? THey move Peters to Dockery's position and move Chambers to LT. TD would love that.
          sacrifice1
          https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

          Comment

          • DesertFox24
            Registered User
            • Jul 2005
            • 2129
            #6
            Re: Chambers back

            He would be better than a rookie for at least next season. How old is he I thought he was 27 or something but I thiunk bb.com roster has him as over 30?

            Comment

            • bigbub2352
              Registered User
              • Feb 2005
              • 5386
              #7
              Re: Chambers back

              kirk chambers would be solid depth
              XTRA CRISPY XTRA SAUCEY

              Comment

              • patmoran2006
                Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
                • Dec 2005
                • 19840
                #8
                Re: Chambers back

                Chambers is a DISASTER as a starting guard, he's depth on this team.


                Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

                Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

                Comment

                • floridajoe
                  Registered User
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 130
                  #9
                  Re: Chambers back

                  Originally posted by ddaryl
                  logical might have been getting chambers signed then releasing Dockery

                  but I was surprised that they hadn't gotten this done yet.
                  I don't think this was ever in doubt. Its a good mutual move.

                  Comment

                  • Tatonka
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 21289
                    #10
                    Re: Chambers back

                    i dont think that i want chambers starting but NO ONE can say that he did anything but play great when called upon last year. i feel completely comfortable with him in the line up for an injury.
                    "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
                    • 👍 1

                    Comment

                    • patmoran2006
                      Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 19840
                      #11
                      Re: Chambers back

                      I got no problem with this, as long as he isn't our next starting LG.

                      He was a good backup.


                      Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

                      Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

                      Comment

                      • patmoran2006
                        Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 19840
                        #12
                        Re: Chambers back

                        Originally posted by Tatonka
                        i dont think that i want chambers starting but NO ONE can say that he did anything but play great when called upon last year. i feel completely comfortable with him in the line up for an injury.
                        he was a disaster that game at RG but overall you're right.. Im glad we brought him back.


                        Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

                        Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

                        Comment

                        • psubills62
                          Legendary Zoner
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 11295
                          #13
                          Re: Chambers back

                          He was a better-than-expected tackle. I'm glad they will bring him back.
                          "Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
                          - Nicholas Cummings

                          Comment

                          • Night Train
                            Retired - On Several Levels
                            • Jul 2005
                            • 33117
                            #14
                            Re: Chambers back

                            As a backup/fill in starter, he's been more than fine. Earned his roster spot.
                            Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

                            Comment

                            • DBrown77
                              Watching the Bills suck since 1999
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 1285
                              #15
                              Re: Chambers back

                              Any confirmation on the signing? It says they are close to a deal

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X