Bal, Cinc, Clev, Pit, Chic, GB, IND, Jac, TEN, ATL, CAR, NO, PHI, OAK, SD, ARI, and Sea all have not made any signings. Thats 18 teams that havent made any signings. Only 14 have not signed anyone.
For the insite
Collapse
X
-
Re: For the insite
Originally posted by Mitchell59Bal, Cinc, Clev, Pit, Chic, GB, IND, Jac, TEN, ATL, CAR, NO, PHI, OAK, SD, ARI, and Sea all have not made any signings. Thats 18 teams that havent made any signings. Only 14 have not signed anyone.
Comment
-
-
Re: For the insite
Originally posted by jimbohastle51this isnt true, NO has signed vilma and stinchcomb. BAL signed dominique foxworth. Cincy signed chris crocker. and JAC signed sean considine. even if some of those are resignings they didnt happen till free agency started and they ALL count against the cap.
Im talking strickly FA signings.
Comment
-
-
Re: For the insite
Originally posted by keithtryou cannot justify the incompetance on the bills by pointing out the incompetence of others
No, maybe they have it right!
Yet Dallas nor Washington made it and they spend tons.
I was talking with my friend about this yesterday. The wise teams dont spend huge money it seems. The successful ones build through the draft and add a quality vet or two.
Maybe were finally being smart. Maybe we will spend money on high quality vets at a cheap price after all the dust settles. It may not be as flashy, but the Pats have done it every year.
Maybe the Bills are finally getting it right!Last edited by X-Era; 03-01-2009, 07:35 AM.
Comment
-
-
Re: For the insite
EE, your argument of building thru the draft is valid IF and I shout IF your front office has the remotest clue on how and who to draft. the bills seem to have no clue on talent eval and have bombed for years now on drafing guys that make a team greatIn my day we did not have self-esteem... we had self-respect, and no more of it then we earned.
Comment
-
Comment