Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mitchell55
    only another 1000 mocks due by tomorrow!
    • Feb 2008
    • 5214

    Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

    Coles' decision to forgo a guaranteed $6 million salary in favor of getting his release isn't looking good at all so far. The 31-year-old has received light interest from the Bengals and only made one free agent visit
  • TacklingDummy
    Unreachable Douche
    • Jul 2002
    • 71725

    #2
    Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

    Hopefully he signs elsewhere.

    People broke my ball for wanting to trade for Chad Johnson who some say is in decline and had a down year. If so than wtf is Coles?

    No thanks, the Bills don't need another midget at WR.

    Comment

    • Dr. Lecter
      Zero for Zero!
      • Mar 2003
      • 67938

      #3
      Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

      Except he does not play like a "midget".

      People break your balls for wanting to trade Lynch for Johnson, who is a locker room headache and big mouth glory hound.

      Big difference.
      Originally posted by mysticsoto
      Lecter is right in everything he said.

      Comment

      • jimbohastle51
        All-Pro Zoner
        • Feb 2005
        • 1823

        #4
        Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

        Originally posted by TacklingDummy
        Hopefully he signs elsewhere.

        People broke my ball for wanting to trade for Chad Johnson who some say is in decline and had a down year. If so than wtf is Coles?

        No thanks, the Bills don't need another midget at WR.
        i agree that his size is not what we should look for but hardy dropped half the balls thrown to him last year and steve johnson is still really young to depend on week in and week out. besides reed (who has zero speed at all) and evans, we really do not have another solid WR on the roster.

        Comment

        • TacklingDummy
          Unreachable Douche
          • Jul 2002
          • 71725

          #5
          Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

          Originally posted by Dr.Lecter

          People break your balls for wanting to trade Lynch for Johnson, who is a locker room headache and big mouth glory hound.

          Big difference.
          I've never said Lynch for Johnson that I recall.

          Big difference is Johnson is a player teams defense against, Lynch is just another dime a dozen running back.

          Johnson makes Evans, Edwards, Jackson, and Lynch better.

          Coles will make them about the same as last year.

          Comment

          • Mitchell55
            only another 1000 mocks due by tomorrow!
            • Feb 2008
            • 5214

            #6
            Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

            Coles, 11 out of last 13 TDs in redzone. Lynch is our best player, why trade him. He is also our best lockerroom guy. Coles also had 7 TDs last year, he is not declinning unlike Chad who had only 4 TDs. Only 2 more than hardy.

            Comment

            • Mitchell55
              only another 1000 mocks due by tomorrow!
              • Feb 2008
              • 5214

              #7
              Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

              Originally posted by TacklingDummy
              I've never said Lynch for Johnson that I recall.

              Big difference is Johnson is a player teams defense against, Lynch is just another dime a dozen running back.

              Johnson makes Evans, Edwards, Jackson, and Lynch better.

              Coles will make them about the same as last year.

              Coles is better than Johnson now. All Johnson has is size.

              Comment

              • TacklingDummy
                Unreachable Douche
                • Jul 2002
                • 71725

                #8
                Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

                Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                Except he does not play like a "midget".
                How would you describe 22 Rec, 370 yards, 1 TD?

                If he was worth a dime the Jets would have tried to keep him.

                Comment

                • TacklingDummy
                  Unreachable Douche
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 71725

                  #9
                  Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

                  Originally posted by Mitchell59
                  Coles is better than Johnson now.
                  I've never made fun of your posts like everyone else does on here but this statement is funny.

                  Comment

                  • Mitchell55
                    only another 1000 mocks due by tomorrow!
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 5214

                    #10
                    Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

                    Originally posted by TacklingDummy
                    How would you describe 22 Rec, 370 yards, 1 TD?

                    If he was worth a dime the Jets would have tried to keep him.



                    Whos stats are those? Defintley not Coles

                    Comment

                    • Mski
                      Registered User
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 6753

                      #11
                      Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

                      Originally posted by TacklingDummy
                      I've never said Lynch for Johnson that I recall.

                      Big difference is Johnson is a player teams defense against, Lynch is just another dime a dozen running back.

                      Johnson makes Evans, Edwards, Jackson, and Lynch better.

                      Coles will make them about the same as last year.
                      i disagree... coles will make the offense better... while he is not the reciever he once was, he is a guy with great hands, decent speed, and very physical... that being said, he is a faster version of josh reed(minus the blocking) who can go over the midle and strech the field @31 he is approaching the decline in his carreer, but he can still produce, and will force teams to respect him in coverage, freeing up evans
                      RIP Tommy D!
                      12/25/1978-9/9/2008


                      If you make something "Idiot-proof", they'll only make better idiots!

                      Comment

                      • Mitchell55
                        only another 1000 mocks due by tomorrow!
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 5214

                        #12
                        Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

                        Originally posted by Mski
                        i disagree... coles will make the offense better... while he is not the reciever he once was, he is a guy with great hands, decent speed, and very physical... that being said, he is a faster version of josh reed(minus the blocking) who can go over the midle and strech the field @31 he is approaching the decline in his carreer, but he can still produce, and will force teams to respect him in coverage, freeing up evans


                        He did have one of his best seasons last year.

                        Comment

                        • jimbohastle51
                          All-Pro Zoner
                          • Feb 2005
                          • 1823

                          #13
                          Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

                          Originally posted by Mitchell59
                          Coles, 11 out of last 13 TDs in redzone. Lynch is our best player, why trade him. He is also our best lockerroom guy. Coles also had 7 TDs last year, he is not declinning unlike Chad who had only 4 TDs. Only 2 more than hardy.
                          lynch is our best locker room guy?!?!? i know he is liked, but i dont think he is the "man" in the locker room.

                          Comment

                          • Dr. Lecter
                            Zero for Zero!
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 67938

                            #14
                            Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

                            Originally posted by TacklingDummy
                            How would you describe 22 Rec, 370 yards, 1 TD?

                            If he was worth a dime the Jets would have tried to keep him.
                            Huh?

                            The official source for NFL news, video highlights, fantasy football, game-day coverage, schedules, stats, scores and more.


                            Those are his stats form 2000 - his rookie year.

                            Last year was 70 Rec -850 yards -12.2 average -7 TDs
                            Originally posted by mysticsoto
                            Lecter is right in everything he said.

                            Comment

                            • Mr. Pink
                              Peterman Sucks!
                              • Mar 2006
                              • 35303

                              #15
                              Re: Per rotoworld, Cinci not trying hard for coles

                              I still think there is no way feasible we sign Coles.

                              A. He thinks he's worth 6 million a year still.

                              B. He probably wants to play for a contender.

                              C. He's a better WR than Lee Evans and we all know what he makes.

                              When you factor all of this in, you're probably looking at at least 8.5 mil per season to get it done here.

                              I don't think there's a snowballs chance in hell we bring him in.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X