If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Both? Seriously? No. I think we have a sweet blend of new and old as it is. If we have both, we would be old heavy, and then lose Johnson, who may very well be the future of the position.
When I knew both players were going to be available, I went with wanting Holt over TO. I've changed my mind. Holt may get more yardage than TO, but TO has always scored more touchdowns and he is much more of a physical receive than Holt. Holt is too similar to Evans in stature and style. We need somebody that can get into the endzone.
TO also makes things more interesting, and I'm sure we'll be featured a lot more. We'll probably get a Sunday Night game with Madden and Michaels finally because of this, too.
Holt is past his prime. TO, while old, is in great shape and still playing at a high level. While Holt is far less likely to cause problems, he's also less likely to be productive at this point.
Because of the nature of the deal, i.e. 1 year, definitely TO.
We either would have had to pick up the two years left on Holt's deal, or sign him to another one.
A one year deal is ideal for us, as it gives Hardy and Johnson time to learn without pressure.
I was watching the first matchup of Dallas and Philly last night on NFL Replay. Owens stretched the field with a 72 yard TD and then easily beat Dawkins on a slant route in the end zone.
When's the last time Buffalo had a receiver that could do both of those things so well? Who cares, we have one now.
Comment