If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Im not saying we should or will, but heres a senerio for trading Peters
Re: Im not saying we should or will, but heres a senerio for trading Peters
what you fail to see, is that there are 2 reasons we would trade peters if we do. 1- because we do not want to pay him upwords of 11 million dollars a year, and 2- because there are 4 LT available in the draft that are very elite and we can get one at 11. there will be no trading peters and then drafting a DT in the first round, if we do the trade it is to get a TACKLE at 11, and then our DE or TE later in the first round. and the eagles will probably give up a 1 and a 3 or peters.
Re: Im not saying we should or will, but heres a senerio for trading Peters
Originally posted by jimbohastle51
what you fail to see, is that there are 2 reasons we would trade peters if we do. 1- because we do not want to pay him upwords of 11 million dollars a year, and 2- because there are 4 LT available in the draft that are very elite and we can get one at 11. there will be no trading peters and then drafting a DT in the first round, if we do the trade it is to get a TACKLE at 11, and then our DE or TE later in the first round. and the eagles will probably give up a 1 and a 3 or peters.
Now. Det, STL, maybe KC, SF, GB, Jac, Oak, Cinc, and Seattle all need a OT in the top 10. No way a top 4 prospect will fall.
Re: Im not saying we should or will, but heres a senerio for trading Peters
Originally posted by Mitchell59
Im confused by the thing in red?
Many people say 1st and third. I just wanted it to be known I wouldn't do that. Especially not with the Eagles. If KC or Detroit, or someone who picks way higher, wanted to give a 1st and third maybe. A top 10 and an early 3rd might do it. But, not a #20+ and a late 3rd rounder, no thanks.
Originally posted by jimbohastle51
and the eagles will probably give up a 1 and a 3 or peters.
"Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad
"I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad
"Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad
"Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad
"I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad
Re: Im not saying we should or will, but heres a senerio for trading Peters
Originally posted by Mitchell59
Now. Det, STL, maybe KC, SF, GB, Jac, Oak, Cinc, and Seattle all need a OT in the top 10. No way a top 4 prospect will fall.
4 OTs, B.J (DT), Orakpo, Curry, 2 QBs, 1 WR. Thats 10. For you to be right, everybody would be right....... that never happens, not to mention, I think I'm forgetting a guy.
A RB or 2 could sneak in, a different DE or 2, a CB, or 1 more WR. Too many "ifs".
I do not believe all 4 top OT will be gone by 11, the draft is way to unpredictable to be predicted like that.
"Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad
"I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad
"Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad
"Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad
"I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad
Re: Im not saying we should or will, but heres a senerio for trading Peters
Originally posted by HHURRICANE
I think we should trade every player and start over. Than when they get good we should do the same thing over and over and over again.
The FO shoukd have given him a deal that was 6 million a year when they tried to steal him for 3 million a year.
The FO should have negotiated at 7-8 million a year when Peters held out last summer.
Our FO sucks.
I dont know if this is a snap at me for making this post but I did write clearly that I dont think we should trade Peters, I was just writing the best senerio if we do.
Re: Im not saying we should or will, but heres a senerio for trading Peters
A player like Peters is always going to want the most money possible and could cause problems each year that another LT gets a little bit more coin than him. But on the other hand, a LT like him doesn't fall in your laps very often, if ever. We need to make him happy and bite the financial bullet.
Re: Im not saying we should or will, but heres a senerio for trading Peters
Originally posted by jamze132
A player like Peters is always going to want the most money possible and could cause problems each year that another LT gets a little bit more coin than him. But on the other hand, a LT like him doesn't fall in your laps very often, if ever. We need to make him happy and bite the financial bullet.
I say give him 9-10 million with a **** load of extras. Bonus, big guarentee, trade claus/franchise claus.
Tweet
" ~ yordad
Comment