Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • HHURRICANE
    Registered User
    • Mar 2005
    • 15490
    #1

    Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

    This board has things backwards.

    Peters is a talent at LT. He admitted making a mistake sitting out and it hurt his play. He still made the Pro Bowl and he has a chance at being the best LT in the league.

    Peters loves Buffalo. He wants to play in Buffalo. The guy was pissed that he was making half of what Dockery was making. He looks even more justified because we cut the guy and gave him 20 million dollars for 2 years.

    Read again. Dockery made 20 million dollars in 2 years!! So now we are *****ing abouting paying Peters 10-11 million a year???

    Roscoe Parrish is an undersized WR that can't get off the line. Watch the tape. He spends half his time on his butt and that is one of the reasons he's not making plays on the offense.

    He's a great punt returner. That's it. Punt returner only. With Mcklevin, Roscoe is now a luxury player that we could trade for real value.

    Having 2 return specialist on one team is ridiculous considering the holes still open.

    Punt returner has not helped this team get to a playoff. The o-line is one of the ways we get there.

    Get your priorities straight!!
    Tags: None
  • Dr. Lecter
    Zero for Zero!
    • Mar 2003
    • 67946
    #2
    Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

    I agree with your premise, but your comparison of Dockery's deal and what Peters appears to want is grossly misleading. Peters will get 25 or more in his first two years.

    Sadly it sounds as if Peters wants 12 million per or more and the Bills are being stupid and only offering about 8.5 million per. Both sides need to wake up and sign a deal worth around 10 million per with 30-35 million guaranteed.
    Originally posted by mysticsoto
    Lecter is right in everything he said.
    • 👍 2

    Comment

    • mayotm
      Registered User
      • Jul 2003
      • 2333
      #3
      Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

      I'm confused. Where are all the threads suggesting the Bills should keep Parrish over Peters? What does one player have to do with the other?
      • 👍 4

      Comment

      • HHURRICANE
        Registered User
        • Mar 2005
        • 15490
        #4
        Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

        Originally posted by mayotm
        I'm confused. Where are all the threads suggesting the Bills should keep Parrish over Peters? What does one player have to do with the other?
        Do I really need to pull every post and thread. There are more than enough to find on your own.

        If you agree that Peters is the keeper and Parrish is expendable than there is no need for you to comment.

        Comment

        • HHURRICANE
          Registered User
          • Mar 2005
          • 15490
          #5
          Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

          Originally posted by mayotm
          I'm confused. Where are all the threads suggesting the Bills should keep Parrish over Peters? What does one player have to do with the other?
          Look at how many trade scenario threads there are already on Peters.

          Comment

          • Yasgur's Farm
            Moderator
            • Feb 2005
            • 7091
            #6
            Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

            HH... Do you think JP should accept this hypothetical $11M/year contract offer?

            5 year $55M
            $12.25M bonus
            $4.75M '09
            $6.15M '10
            $8M '11
            $10.35M '12
            $13.5M '13
            =$17M guaranteed in '09

            I'd even consider guaranteeing his '10 and '11 salaries as well... That's $31.15M guaranteed money.

            But he's gonna have to earn his '12 and '13 salaries. Something he didn't do last season IMO.
            Last edited by Yasgur's Farm; 03-15-2009, 11:19 AM.

            Comment

            • Dr. Lecter
              Zero for Zero!
              • Mar 2003
              • 67946
              #7
              Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

              Originally posted by HHURRICANE
              Look at how many trade scenario threads there are already on Peters.
              But nobody is advocating keeping Parrish over Peters. This is like when you said nobody was commenting on the lack of a LG on this team. It simply is not true.
              Originally posted by mysticsoto
              Lecter is right in everything he said.
              • 👍 3

              Comment

              • Lefty2985
                Registered User
                • Mar 2004
                • 216
                #8
                Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

                WE CANT AFFORD NOT TO HAVE PETERS AND ON TOP OF IT HE LIKES BUFFALO AND PLAYING HERE. BE HONEST NOT THAT MANY STARS WANT TO PLAY HERE IN THE WEATHER!!!! SIGN HIM GET IT DONE.!

                Comment

                • Tatonka
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 21289
                  #9
                  Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

                  HH, your right.. peters made a mistake.. he held out last year and it hurt him.. after watching the tape, the bills decided he is not worth as much as he does.. so he ****ed himself.. and if he doesnt like it..well he can play under the current contract for 2 more years. he is lucky the bills are even open to redoing his deal.

                  parrish has nothing to do with peters. nothing.
                  "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
                  • 👍 2

                  Comment

                  • DraftBoy
                    Administrator
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 107442
                    #10
                    Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

                    I'm confused was the intent of this thread to just state your opinion on Peters and Parrish? And if so then why not do that is of the other countless threads on the two of them.
                    COMING SOON...
                    Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
                    • 👍 3

                    Comment

                    • DraftBoy
                      Administrator
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 107442
                      #11
                      Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

                      Peters is not lucky that the Bills are willing to work on his deal. They promised they would work on re-doing his deal to end his last holdout.
                      COMING SOON...
                      Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                      We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
                      • 👍 1

                      Comment

                      • HHURRICANE
                        Registered User
                        • Mar 2005
                        • 15490
                        #12
                        Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

                        Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                        But nobody is advocating keeping Parrish over Peters. This is like when you said nobody was commenting on the lack of a LG on this team. It simply is not true.
                        Read this board and it's posts!!

                        Owens came in and there were several posts about "NE being concerned" and "do we have th best offense", etc. I like the Owens signing as long as there isn't a stop gap at RG or LG. Every day that goes by it looks more and more likely that it's Chambers and a rookie at RG or LG depending on where Butler goes. Look at how many posts were advocating a rookie at LG. That's insane.

                        Peters has already generated the "here we go again" threads. The guy wants
                        11 million dollars a year. So what? People act like LT's are a dime a dozen around here. They are not! Ask Arizona if they would like Peters?

                        Parrish is exciting so he get's a pass?

                        The fact that the o-line started to get addressed a few years ago was the first encouraging sign that the bills were serious about winning.

                        Now we are advocating a brand new left side?? Edwards will get killed if this happens. Guaranteed.

                        Comment

                        • Dr. Lecter
                          Zero for Zero!
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 67946
                          #13
                          Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

                          I really don't understand a thing you said.

                          There have been a ton of threads on the LG situation. There were 3 the day you posted your thread about it. Many here do not want Peters gone, although there are some. He is asking for 12 million per. He can have 10.5 per and be happy about it.

                          And who is giving Parrish a free pass? He likely has little trade value so why discuss it? A 6th round pick does not get me excited.

                          And I agree that w/o Peters Edwards gets killed.
                          Originally posted by mysticsoto
                          Lecter is right in everything he said.
                          • 👍 1

                          Comment

                          • jamze132
                            Don’t hate…
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 29408
                            #14
                            Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

                            Peters and Parrish are still not similar...
                            • 👍 2

                            Comment

                            • Dr. Lecter
                              Zero for Zero!
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 67946
                              #15
                              Re: Peters and Roscoe Parrish.

                              I think I will start a thread about how people want to get rid of Peters and keep Bruce Hall.
                              Originally posted by mysticsoto
                              Lecter is right in everything he said.
                              • 👍 2

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X