Just heard the WGR radio interview with Mr. Simmons. He really puts this Toronto game in a new light and he claims that he has sources.
According to him, the deal of loads of money for 5 regular season games in Toronto in 5 seasons is to give an eventual buyer of the Bills (when Ralph passes) an advantage - at the time, the buyer would be Mr. Rogers.
He reasons that if another buyer comes around, say from LA or Vegas, wants to buy the Bills, that buyer would be facing the issue of having to play one home game in Toronto, which makes it very unattractive.
Now if Toronto manages to extend the deal to get to two or more games in more years, it will be even more unattractive to others.
The Rogers lost 7 million dollars for each game they played in Toronto, but they consider it an investment because when the Bills are up for sale, it's obvious who has the advantage right there.
Even now Rogers has passed away, Mr. Simmons revealed that his sources told him that potential buyer "is right there."
According to him, the deal of loads of money for 5 regular season games in Toronto in 5 seasons is to give an eventual buyer of the Bills (when Ralph passes) an advantage - at the time, the buyer would be Mr. Rogers.
He reasons that if another buyer comes around, say from LA or Vegas, wants to buy the Bills, that buyer would be facing the issue of having to play one home game in Toronto, which makes it very unattractive.
Now if Toronto manages to extend the deal to get to two or more games in more years, it will be even more unattractive to others.
The Rogers lost 7 million dollars for each game they played in Toronto, but they consider it an investment because when the Bills are up for sale, it's obvious who has the advantage right there.
Even now Rogers has passed away, Mr. Simmons revealed that his sources told him that potential buyer "is right there."
Comment