PDA

View Full Version : Gonzo still looking for trade (merged)



kelly2reed4six
03-24-2009, 10:14 PM
He's obviously still got some serious gas in the tank. After being the biggest threat on a terrible team he still caught nearly a 100 balls for over 1k yards and double digit td's. I know he supposedly voided a trade to b-lo last year, but we also didn't have TO last year. I would think it might at least be worth it to see what they would want for him and see if he has any interest in playing here now!

Thoughts?

psubills62
03-24-2009, 10:15 PM
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought the Chiefs said recently that Gonzalez was absolutely not available for trade?

Jaybird
03-24-2009, 10:18 PM
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought the Chiefs said recently that Gonzalez was absolutely not available for trade?

Even if they did say that, it is a strategy to keep his trade stock up, but I do not recall the team mentioning anything about not trading him.

Did he not reject a trade to the bills before last years deadline?

Mudflap1
03-24-2009, 10:19 PM
Apparently, legend has it the Bills made an offer for Gonzo last year, the Chiefs were willing to pursue it, but Gonzo vetoed the trade because he didn't want to play for Buffalo.

Jon

circlethewagons
03-24-2009, 10:20 PM
I doubt they'll trade him based on the owners comments today, and that they want as many weapons as possible for Cassel

kelly2reed4six
03-24-2009, 10:22 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4013606

Yes, that was last year. As I noted, we didn't have TO last year. One big name player could most certainly change the mind of another.

Jaybird
03-24-2009, 10:22 PM
I doubt they'll trade him based on the owners comments today, and that they want as many weapons as possible for Cassel

yet they also said it is an open competition at QB!

weird

SquishDaFish
03-24-2009, 10:25 PM
They said today he isnt being traded

venis2k1
03-25-2009, 12:17 AM
Pass. Anyone that refuses to play for buffalo can go **** themselves...except for Jim Kelly.

kelly2reed4six
03-25-2009, 12:25 AM
I hardly think you can blame the guy for not wanting to play for Buffalo. 9 Years no playoffs. Remember, he wanted to play for a contender, which blo has been FAR from for years! With the addition of to maybe that makes us a contender to him?

Luisito23
03-25-2009, 02:23 AM
Pass. Anyone that refuses to play for buffalo can go **** themselves...except for Jim Kelly.



:bf1: :up:

The King
03-25-2009, 08:22 AM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AoZ8S80j4K1uO9vnjKlFnIhDubYF?slug=ap-chiefs-gonzalez&prov=ap&type=lgns


“If the right deal can be made, Tony very much wants the Chiefs to trade him,” the person said. “Tony is not demanding a trade. Tony cherishes the time he’s spent with the Chiefs and he loves the way he’s always been treated by the fans there. But he knows of some other teams that would be interested in him and if the right deal can be made, he wants it to be made.”

ddaryl
03-25-2009, 08:25 AM
well it fell through last year and I do not believe the Bills are even going to pursue it this year because of last year.

HHURRICANE
03-25-2009, 08:31 AM
well it fell through last year and I do not believe the Bills are even going to pursue it this year because of last year.

I agree. He's less valuable now. At the time the Bills were looking at a potential run at the playoffs and he would have been a very good fit. That train has left the station and I don't think this is the "right trade" that Gonzales is talking about anyway.

Mahdi
03-25-2009, 08:33 AM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AoZ8S80j4K1uO9vnjKlFnIhDubYF?slug=ap-chiefs-gonzalez&prov=ap&type=lgns
Pioli will not do a deal that hurts the Pats in any way.

acehole
03-25-2009, 08:35 AM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AoZ8S80j4K1uO9vnjKlFnIhDubYF?slug=ap-chiefs-gonzalez&prov=ap&type=lgns


Pass.

Raptor
03-25-2009, 09:25 AM
Its over with, he's not coming here

streetkings01
03-25-2009, 09:26 AM
If a girl told you.....not even if you were the last man on earth......would you still go after her?

Jeff1220
03-25-2009, 10:20 AM
If he "knows of teams that are interested," wouldn't that qualify as tampering?