Why Peters havent been traded?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TonyBlack
    Registered User
    • Feb 2009
    • 136

    Why Peters havent been traded?

    i mean if he aint happy being a "bill" like cutler wasnt happy either then trade him for some early draft picks GEEEEZ is not like he's the only o-line player out there. i know he one of the bests but DAMN DAMN DAMN...trade him to seahawks or rams or something.

    ***I KNOW I HAVENT POST GOOD TOPICS BUT PLEASE DONT BAN ME, IM A REAL BILLS FAN I KNOW I CAN DO BETTER BUT PLEAZZZZZ***
  • patmoran2006
    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
    • Dec 2005
    • 19840

    #2
    Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

    The goal is to work out a deal. Prime LT's don't fall off trees and the draft is a crapshoot.

    But having said that, if they're still far away by draft day time I'd be shocked if he's not traded.

    But there is a 0.0% chance the Bills get a package even in that ballpark that Cutler got.


    Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

    Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

    Comment

    • Romes
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 5764

      #3
      Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

      Originally posted by paladin warrior
      RALPH is drove me nut.

      Comment

      • TacklingDummy
        Unreachable Douche
        • Jul 2002
        • 71725

        #4
        Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

        Originally posted by patmoran2006
        The goal is to work out a deal. Prime LT's don't fall off trees and the draft is a crapshoot..
        Wouldn't it be smarter than for a team who is picking a LT high in the draft to trade for a "prime LT"?


        Originally posted by patmoran2006
        But there is a 0.0% chance the Bills get a package even in that ballpark that Cutler got.
        Why not? You just said "prime LT's don't fall off trees". A 1st and a 3rd should not be unrealistic.
        Last edited by TacklingDummy; 04-02-2009, 07:53 PM.

        Comment

        • DrGraves
          Registered User
          • Mar 2008
          • 2693

          #5
          Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

          i wish we would just suck it up and pay the dude. its not like we are going to use that cap space anyways.

          Comment

          • yordad
            Registered User
            • Dec 2007
            • 11867

            #6
            Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

            Originally posted by TacklingDummy
            Wouldn't it be smarter than for a team who is picking a LT high in the draft to trade for a "prime LT"?


            Why not? You just said "prime LT's don't fall off trees". A 1st and a 3rd should not be unrealistic.
            Didn't we have this conversation with him before? Déjà vu.
            Last edited by yordad; 04-02-2009, 08:04 PM.
            "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

            "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

            "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

            "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

            "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad

            Comment

            • HHURRICANE
              Registered User
              • Mar 2005
              • 15490

              #7
              Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

              A proven LT is in such demand that trading himm for an unknown first makes 0 sense.

              Comment

              • TacklingDummy
                Unreachable Douche
                • Jul 2002
                • 71725

                #8
                Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

                Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                A proven LT is in such demand that trading himm for an unknown first makes 0 sense.

                So the team trading draft picks, "unknown", for Peters would be making the smart move?

                So why wouldn't a team who's picking a LT early in the draft just not give Buffalo a call about Peters instead? After all Peters in this elite left tackle and left tackles don't fall off of trees.
                Last edited by TacklingDummy; 04-02-2009, 10:23 PM.

                Comment

                • jamze132
                  Don’t hate…
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 29295

                  #9
                  Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

                  Originally posted by TonyBlack
                  i mean if he aint happy being a "bill" like cutler wasnt happy either then trade him for some early draft picks GEEEEZ is not like he's the only o-line player out there. i know he one of the bests but DAMN DAMN DAMN...trade him to seahawks or rams or something.

                  ***I KNOW I HAVENT POST GOOD TOPICS BUT PLEASE DONT BAN ME, IM A REAL BILLS FAN I KNOW I CAN DO BETTER BUT PLEAZZZZZ***
                  Florida education?

                  Comment

                  • justasportsfan
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 71579

                    #10
                    Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

                    Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                    A proven LT is in such demand that trading himm for an unknown first makes 0 sense.
                    Especially for a team (bills) thats still waiting for ANY of the players they've drafted since they've been here to become above average players at their respective positions.
                    sacrifice1
                    https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                    Comment

                    • acehole
                      Registered User
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 4876

                      #11
                      Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

                      This "Prime LT" did (fall off a tree) lest we forget. UDFA as I recall. Let him go for the right deal...we need the picks....


                      Originally posted by patmoran2006
                      The goal is to work out a deal. Prime LT's don't fall off trees and the draft is a crapshoot.

                      But having said that, if they're still far away by draft day time I'd be shocked if he's not traded.

                      But there is a 0.0% chance the Bills get a package even in that ballpark that Cutler got.
                      Hated by the stupid..
                      Loved by their moms.

                      Comment

                      • X-Era
                        What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
                        • Feb 2005
                        • 27670

                        #12
                        Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

                        Originally posted by patmoran2006
                        The goal is to work out a deal. Prime LT's don't fall off trees and the draft is a crapshoot.

                        But having said that, if they're still far away by draft day time I'd be shocked if he's not traded.

                        But there is a 0.0% chance the Bills get a package even in that ballpark that Cutler got.
                        If we get a 1st rounder for him and then spend it on a new LT, thats basically a wasted pick. We didnt get better on the field by doing that move, and we dont upgrade a position of need.

                        The move doesnt make a whole lot of sense to me.

                        Comment

                        • billogic99
                          Registered User
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 398

                          #13
                          Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

                          I keep reading Peters is an "elite" LT, well he sure as hell hasn't played like one. He's played well, but elite? How is it we can ignore 11.5 sacks and still call the guy elite? I realize he's missed some tine due to injury and missing camp, but isn't part of being elite being the guy who isn't injured and isn't missing camp? Just sayin.

                          Comment

                          • acehole
                            Registered User
                            • Jan 2006
                            • 4876

                            #14
                            Re: Why Peters havent been traded?

                            Originally posted by billogic99
                            I keep reading Peters is an "elite" LT, well he sure as hell hasn't played like one. He's played well, but elite? How is it we can ignore 11.5 sacks and still call the guy elite? I realize he's missed some tine due to injury and missing camp, but isn't part of being elite being the guy who isn't injured and isn't missing camp? Just sayin.

                            Shhhh not to loud, make sure Philly cant hear you..
                            Hated by the stupid..
                            Loved by their moms.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X