Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

[ghz in pittsburgh]

http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFLDraft/Draft+Extras/2009/wwhi040209.htm

I don't think so but it could be interesting, particularly if both Stafford and Sanchez are selected in the top 10. That'll put a little pressure on those teams vying for a 1st round QB - and there are a few behind the Bills.

[yordad]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

I made a similar post yesterday. I also added that the Bills could dupe the Broncos into swaping 1st, and making them give up their newly aquired 3rd, just by pretending there was other teams interested.

[DraftBoy]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

I made a similar post yesterday. I also added that the Bills could dupe the Broncos into swaping 1st, and making them give up their newly aquired 3rd, just by pretending there was other teams interested.

How would we dupe them? We play two vaslty different versions of defense and our offenses aren't very similar either. Who would we want who they would also want?

[clumping platelets]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

I'd take Scheffler in a swap of 1st's

[THATHURMANATOR]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

How would we dupe them? We play two vaslty different versions of defense and our offenses aren't very similar either. Who would we want who they would also want?

I think he meant duping them that another team may want a player they covet

[yordad]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

How would we dupe them? We play two vaslty different versions of defense and our offenses aren't very similar either. Who would we want who they would also want?

If one of the QBs drops to us, we don't have to have another team interested in him. We can call the Broncos and pretend we have trade offers, and see what they have to offer. We could get their newly aquired 3rd for a swap, or like someone else mentioned, we could get their TE.

It wouldn't be the first time this was done.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

I don't think McDaniels needs a Sanchez if he can take a Cassel and make him an above average qb. He could go with Freeman or PAt White without having to give up a first pick. In the meantime I am almost sure he can make Orton a better qb than he was at chicago to hold the fort down for a year.

[ghz in pittsburgh]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

I don't think McDaniels needs a Sanchez if he can take a Cassel and make him an above average qb. He could go with Freeman or PAt White without having to give up a first pick. In the meantime I am almost sure he can make Orton a better qb than he was at chicago to hold the fort down for a year.

In all likelyhood, Denver will draft D players.

I heard this morning that Denver has not gone out to study any QBs in the draft so far. That could change soon. IF McDaniels' study makes him high on someone in particular, then things could change considerably.

I agree Orton is likely the starter this year, and he may even turns out great. But I think he'll draft someone just in case. Hey even the great Tom Brady sat for a year. And Denver has enough high draft picks that they can certainly play around with ease.

[DraftBoy]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

I agree with both the guys above, Denver is going to concentrate on D in this draft.

[Ed]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

I don't understand why that article states that Cleveland is a landing spot for a passer. They have Quinn and Anderson. Even if they traded one of those guys, why would they use a top 10 pick on a qb?

[justasportsfan]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

In all likelyhood, Denver will draft D players.

I heard this morning that Denver has not gone out to study any QBs in the draft so far. That could change soon. IF McDaniels' study makes him high on someone in particular, then things could change considerably.

I agree Orton is likely the starter this year, and he may even turns out great. But I think he'll draft someone just in case. Hey even the great Tom Brady sat for a year. And Denver has enough high draft picks that they can certainly play around with ease.

I agree. He's gonna need to fix that D there is competition for 3-4 players . He's gonna need all those picks which is why I don't think he is likely going to grab a qb in the 1st rd when they is raw potential in later rds that McDaniels has proven to develop successfully..

[madness]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

Denver can't afford not to go D in this draft and the teams in obvious need of a QB are already low on picks. There may be other opportunities available come draft day but I don't see this scenario happening.

[Ed]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

I don't think the Broncos will rule out taking a qb, but I don't think they'll consider trading up to grab one. Maybe if one of the top guys fall to them, but they've got too many holes on D and they're not going to give away Cutler for draft picks, just to turn around and give up draft picks for a rookie qb.

[psubills62]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

I don't understand why that article states that Cleveland is a landing spot for a passer. They have Quinn and Anderson. Even if they traded one of those guys, why would they use a top 10 pick on a qb?

Probably because Mangini is lukewarm on both of them. While I'm not a fan of the QB's this year at all, quality beats quantity. One great QB > Two mediocre QB's.

[patmoran2006]

Re: Lots of Play in Store for Bills #11?

As of right now, I'd think Denver would take two front seven players with picks 12 and 18