Say there are two scales, both 1 to 10.
One reflects coaching ability and one reflects the overall talent on an NFL team.
--1 is the WORST. (First pick in the draft bad).
--10 is the BEST. (Definitely Super Bowl caliber).
--Obviously, 2 thru 9 would be a broad spectrum from really bad (2) to Super Bowl capabilities (9).
--5 would be completely average. (.500 type of talent on the talent scale.... And Very, very average on the coaching scale.)
To maximize the chances of winning for your NFL team, you are allowed to add up the two numbers, but not allowed to have anything over 10 TOTAL. You could have a 5 in both, or a 4 in talent and 6 in coaching....or whatever.
The question is, what would you choose that you think would give an NFL team (any NFL team, not necessarily the Bills) the best chances of winning the most amount of games.
Poor coaching, but great talent?
Average at both?
Poor talent, but great coaching?
What would be your two numbers if you had to choose and could only have a total of 10?
One reflects coaching ability and one reflects the overall talent on an NFL team.
--1 is the WORST. (First pick in the draft bad).
--10 is the BEST. (Definitely Super Bowl caliber).
--Obviously, 2 thru 9 would be a broad spectrum from really bad (2) to Super Bowl capabilities (9).
--5 would be completely average. (.500 type of talent on the talent scale.... And Very, very average on the coaching scale.)
To maximize the chances of winning for your NFL team, you are allowed to add up the two numbers, but not allowed to have anything over 10 TOTAL. You could have a 5 in both, or a 4 in talent and 6 in coaching....or whatever.
The question is, what would you choose that you think would give an NFL team (any NFL team, not necessarily the Bills) the best chances of winning the most amount of games.
Poor coaching, but great talent?
Average at both?
Poor talent, but great coaching?
What would be your two numbers if you had to choose and could only have a total of 10?
Comment