For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jpdex12
    Registered User
    • Jan 2005
    • 2670

    For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

    PETERS!

    No way in hell we get two first round picks for an undrafted bloat that luckily made his second probowl and wants to be paid like the top LT in the league that he's not.

    We'll be doing well to get one of Philly's 1st rd picks and a third.
    Where else would you rather be than right here right now?
  • jpdex12
    Registered User
    • Jan 2005
    • 2670

    #2
    Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

    If we even trade with Philly...
    Where else would you rather be than right here right now?

    Comment

    • The Spaz
      Registered User
      • Mar 2003
      • 19066

      #3
      Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

      I think only one guy is saying that.

      Comment

      • Bmax
        Registered User
        • Aug 2003
        • 1711

        #4
        Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

        Originally posted by jpdex12
        PETERS!

        No way in hell we get two first round picks for an undrafted bloat that luckily made his second probowl and wants to be paid like the top LT in the league that he's not.

        We'll be doing well to get one of Philly's 1st rd picks and a third.

        I can't wait to read some of the posts when Walker or Chambers are in at LT and are getting beat like a drum. Some of you just don't have a clue..

        Does the name Jerry Crafts mean anything to anybody who wants to get rid of Peters..



        Bmax

        Comment

        • jpdex12
          Registered User
          • Jan 2005
          • 2670

          #5
          Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

          I don't want to get rid of Peters and I'm sure that most of the other posters on this board don't want to see him go but if you have even an ounce of common sense in you with two weeks left before the draft and no contract extension in hand...he's getting traded.

          How quickly we forget about last year! I suppose you'd rather wait until June to find out that he will hold out again and F up another season for us at LT? What are you planning on trading him then for a 2010 draft pick and end up with Bell at LT or maybe we could play ignorant tough front office and let him pout and sit out to protest the season?

          Smart move is to get the most for him now and avoid the media circus and BS. Move on and fill the vacancy! Get a 1st and 3rd for an undrafted rookie!
          Where else would you rather be than right here right now?

          Comment

          • jamze132
            Don’t hate…
            • Jun 2003
            • 29421

            #6
            Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

            27 year old starting LT who has made two consecutive Pro Bowls, the later being voted in by the coaches and players. They don't grow on trees. The guy wants out of Buffalo, hence his lack of effort during the offseason.

            I don't necessarily believe we can get two first rounders for him but Denver did for Cutler.

            Comment

            • Wally The Barber
              Registered User
              • Jul 2007
              • 3258

              #7
              Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

              OK you win, WE WILL GET 3 first round selections
              Beware of Sarcasm

              Comment

              • Mitchell55
                only another 1000 mocks due by tomorrow!
                • Feb 2008
                • 5214

                #8
                Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

                Peters and Cutler are both 2 of the same. Both are top 5 in there position. Both are the most neediest positions in the NFL. Both demand alot of money. Cutler got traded for a 5th, and Cutler for 3rd, 2 1sts, and Orton. Peters is at least worth 2 1sts if we throw in a 5th.

                Comment

                • Jan Reimers
                  Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
                  • May 2003
                  • 17353

                  #9
                  Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

                  Cutler is a QB. Peters is not. In the NFL, QBs are still more highly valued than LTs.
                  Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

                  Comment

                  • ddaryl
                    Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 10714

                    #10
                    Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

                    were getting 2 1st rd picks for Peters

                    so **** you.

                    Comment

                    • Pinkerton Security
                      Pinkerton's son
                      • Feb 2006
                      • 6003

                      #11
                      Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

                      Originally posted by Mitchell59
                      Peters and Cutler are both 2 of the same. Both are top 5 in there position. Both are the most neediest positions in the NFL. Both demand alot of money. Cutler got traded for a 5th, and Cutler for 3rd, 2 1sts, and Orton. Peters is at least worth 2 1sts if we throw in a 5th.
                      1) Please explain how Cutler got traded for a 5th, AND cutler got traded for 3rd, 1sts and Orton.

                      2) AT LEAST 2 1st's? I love how this becomes real because we throw in the ever-valuable 5th rounder. This scenario doesnt even work in Madden. Im not making fun of YOU for that, bc I am an avid Madden fan myself, I'm just saying that 2 first rounders PLUS some is crazy enough that it wouldnt work in madden, and madden is crazy.

                      Comment

                      • casdhf
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 17542

                        #12
                        Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

                        Originally posted by ddaryl
                        were getting 2 1st rd picks for Peters

                        so **** you.
                        we're
                        Originally posted by BillsZone Mod
                        cas,

                        I'm just letting you know that you have been given 2 points for telling Wys AKA Mark to kill himself.

                        BillsZone Mod

                        Comment

                        • ddaryl
                          Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                          • Jan 2005
                          • 10714

                          #13
                          Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

                          Originally posted by casdhf
                          we're
                          webbah habbah baselves an engrish nazi


                          ya really have ot understand I don't always review my typing and correct grammar... as long as I communicated my point that is all that is important to me
                          Last edited by ddaryl; 04-09-2009, 10:44 AM.

                          Comment

                          • Pinkerton Security
                            Pinkerton's son
                            • Feb 2006
                            • 6003

                            #14
                            Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

                            Originally posted by casdhf
                            we're
                            "We're", actually, if we're going to be like that.

                            Comment

                            • wbat27
                              Registered User
                              • Apr 2003
                              • 93

                              #15
                              Re: For god sakes, quite saying we're getting two 1st Rd picks for

                              there low first round picks bet the value is close to one higgh first rounder

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X