so maybe the whole brian waters trade or the whole cook in buffalo or talking with bills (about scheffler) is stemming from real talks. maybe the bills are trying to use parrish to land scheffler or brian waters. i have a feeling that since mcdaniels is a offensive pass happy coach who watched parrish twice a season deliever huge punt returns and has seen more tape than the average coach on his recieving skills would want this guy to take the wes welker role in his offense. parrish and a 5th for scheffler would be an extremely fair trade that would net us a starting TE and give trent another solid weapon. on the other side waters is getting up there in years and parrish would be a much needed weapon for a team that needs field position any way they can get it with there enemic offense. again pioli is very familiar with parrish and his skills and since waters is a 9 year vet i am sure we could get waters for parrish and a late round pick. even though he is a pro bowl tackle, you would have to give him a handsome contract along with the deal. either way these are 2 great senarios for the bills and both would improve the team as well as get us equal value for parrish. parrish will never be a full time reciever, his size wont allow it. also remember we do have a pro bowl return man in terrence mcgee and a elite returner in mcelivin as well as a solid returner in fred jackson. parrish is replaceable for us, a TE like tony scheffler isnt as easy for us to find. no rookie as talented as he maybe is a guarantee. every one though vernon davis would completely tear the NFL up and he has done nothing. scheffler is proven. also no second round pick could net a guard as good at brian waters right away and we only have T.O. guaranteed for 1 season. either trade scenario would be interesting.
parrish for scheffler or waters???
Collapse
X
-
parrish for scheffler or waters???
so maybe the whole brian waters trade or the whole cook in buffalo or talking with bills (about scheffler) is stemming from real talks. maybe the bills are trying to use parrish to land scheffler or brian waters. i have a feeling that since mcdaniels is a offensive pass happy coach who watched parrish twice a season deliever huge punt returns and has seen more tape than the average coach on his recieving skills would want this guy to take the wes welker role in his offense. parrish and a 5th for scheffler would be an extremely fair trade that would net us a starting TE and give trent another solid weapon. on the other side waters is getting up there in years and parrish would be a much needed weapon for a team that needs field position any way they can get it with there enemic offense. again pioli is very familiar with parrish and his skills and since waters is a 9 year vet i am sure we could get waters for parrish and a late round pick. even though he is a pro bowl tackle, you would have to give him a handsome contract along with the deal. either way these are 2 great senarios for the bills and both would improve the team as well as get us equal value for parrish. parrish will never be a full time reciever, his size wont allow it. also remember we do have a pro bowl return man in terrence mcgee and a elite returner in mcelivin as well as a solid returner in fred jackson. parrish is replaceable for us, a TE like tony scheffler isnt as easy for us to find. no rookie as talented as he maybe is a guarantee. every one though vernon davis would completely tear the NFL up and he has done nothing. scheffler is proven. also no second round pick could net a guard as good at brian waters right away and we only have T.O. guaranteed for 1 season. either trade scenario would be interesting.Tags: None
-
-
Re: parrish for scheffler or waters???
Trading a premier PR for a mid round selection sounds foolish to me!
The Patriots move players for a higher pick then they used to draft themLast edited by Wally The Barber; 04-12-2009, 06:17 PM.Beware of Sarcasm
Comment
-
-
Re: parrish for scheffler or waters???
Originally posted by THE SLAMMERTrading a premier PR for a mid round selection sounds foolish to me!
The Patriots move players for a higher pick then they used to draft them
Comment
-
-
Re: parrish for scheffler or waters???
Originally posted by The Juice Is Loosenot knocking your post, just saying, denver would have zero need for parrish. kansas city might, but they aren't going to give up a pro bowl guard for a punt returner.
we'd have to sweeten the deal. and they said they don't want to trade waters.
Comment
-
-
Re: parrish for scheffler or waters???
Originally posted by Jeff1220This writer makes a lot of assumptions - maybe seeing Parrish 2x a year is why Pioli and McDaniels wouldn't want him.
Comment
-
Comment