A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Juice Is Loose
    All-Pro Zoner
    • Feb 2009
    • 1341

    A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

    Guys I'm at work and I'm BOOOORED. So here is my positive spin on the whole Peters situation.

    I say we give him the Anquan Boldin treatment. No extension. No trade. Shutup and play.

    The positive could be, maybe it motivates him to be as dominant as ever. I'm sure that the bond Boldin has with his teammates is just as strong as Peters has. Peters won't flake out on his teammates, just the management.

    I say we just forget about renegotiating. We have him for two years. I say we just tell him we aren't trading you. We aren't cutting you. We aren't extending you.

    A contract is a contract. Put up or shut up.

    This way, no matter what happens, it helps us.

    If he blows, his value goes down and we just let him go after 2 years. That route he eventually signs a lousy contract with some other team.

    If he kicks butt, its good for us! We can ride out having a dominant LT and the price of a backup, and after his 2 years are up, we can franchise and trade him.

    Does Julius Peppers or Anquan Boldin have any leverage? No.

    Does Peters? No.

    In all 3 cases if the teams just stand strong, all three players will be in uniform for their team week 1.

    The other option could be that eventually a contending team becomes extremely desperate for a LT. At that point we can probably rip them off for Peters.

    My only point is this: I feel the Bills will come out on top in this story. Just like with Clements. He wanted a new deal, we said no. We rode him out for a solid contract year and let him get rich (and underperform) elsewhere.

    We HOLD THE CARDS FELLAS!!!
  • cocamide
    Registered User
    • Oct 2006
    • 2106

    #2
    Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

    I feel the same way, except for the idea that he cares about his teammates.

    Comment

    • HAMMER
      I'm right, Miyagi is wrong.
      • Jul 2003
      • 8132

      #3
      Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

      You are correct.

      Comment

      • ddaryl
        Everything I post is sexual inuendo
        • Jan 2005
        • 10714

        #4
        Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

        I concur.. time to play hardball.

        Draft his eventual or immediate replacement and let it play out from there.

        Not the ideal situation but to let this SOB hold the entire team hostage or to force the team to trade him is rediculous.

        As the situation stands now Peters will lose millions if he does not sign and the Bills refuse to deal him. That would be the stupidest move going.

        Ya have to wonder that when Peters switched agents if Parker has a clause that says if you sign with him you will have to do as your told or pay Parkers agency a certain amount if he decides to sign a contract that Parker does not approve. Therefore Peters is trying to make up for big money he owes Parker one way or another ????

        just trying to make sense of his non-sensical position

        Comment

        • SeatownBillsFan21
          Registered User
          • Mar 2004
          • 2149

          #5
          Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

          Put up or shut up.We do hold the cards and would love him as a Bill but i think the FO may be past that if we net a 1st rounder i think hes a goner

          Comment

          • HHURRICANE
            Registered User
            • Mar 2005
            • 15490

            #6
            Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

            I think everyone is just keeps missing the point here.

            We don't have the luxury at 7-9 to draft a replacement for Peters while he "rots" when we have huge holes at DE, LB, TE and LG to be filled.

            Peters, if signed, is an asset to the team. Make him an asset not a distratction and move on towards the goal of a championship. He makes us better. He's one of the top guys at one of the most important positions in football and he crurrently resides on our roster.

            Are you guys interested in playoffs or rebuilding because if Peters leaves we are rebuilding.

            Walker-Butler-Hangartner-Chambers-Rookie is not taking us to the playoffs. Maybe you folks should pull the tape of Walker playing a season a LT in Oakland before you profess that we'll be just fine without Peters.

            Comment

            • cocamide
              Registered User
              • Oct 2006
              • 2106

              #7
              Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

              Originally posted by HHURRICANE
              I think everyone is just keeps missing the point here.

              We don't have the luxury at 7-9 to draft a replacement for Peters while he "rots" when we have huge holes at DE, LB, TE and LG to be filled.

              Peters, if signed, is an asset to the team. Make him an asset not a distratction and move on towards the goal of a championship. He makes us better. He's one of the top guys at one of the most important positions in football and he crurrently resides on our roster.

              Are you guys interested in playoffs or rebuilding because if Peters leaves we are rebuilding.

              Walker-Butler-Hangartner-Chambers-Rookie is not taking us to the playoffs. Maybe you folks should pull the tape of Walker playing a season a LT in Oakland before you profess that we'll be just fine without Peters.
              I don't see your point. What do you mean 'while he rots'? He's not holding out through the regular season.

              Comment

              • cocamide
                Registered User
                • Oct 2006
                • 2106

                #8
                Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

                I should also say, that I'm only thinking about this year.

                Comment

                • HHURRICANE
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 15490

                  #9
                  Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

                  Originally posted by cocamide
                  I don't see your point. What do you mean 'while he rots'? He's not holding out through the regular season.
                  Some have posted that he will which I agree makes no sense.

                  I guess he could if we doesn't get a new deal.

                  Comment

                  • cocamide
                    Registered User
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 2106

                    #10
                    Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

                    Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                    Some have posted that he will which I agree makes no sense.

                    I guess he could if we doesn't get a new deal.
                    If that's the case, then you're right. We would have a big problem on our hands. I just don't see how he could hold out and lose all that money. Peters just isn't that smart, or he just really wants out of Buffalo.

                    Comment

                    • The Juice Is Loose
                      All-Pro Zoner
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 1341

                      #11
                      Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

                      The Cardinals went to the Super Bowl with Mike Gandy and a guy who was a "distraction" in Anquan Boldin.

                      You can't just make definitive statements like that because every year, teams that are "certainly" not making the playoffs, make the playoffs.

                      I was saying to tell Peters to finish his contract. If he holds out/dogs it, he won't get signed by other teams for big $ either.

                      His only option will be play and play well, just like Boldin's was last year, and will be again this year.

                      I'm also tired of how negative you are. We don't have a "huge hole" at D end. Last year our best guy missed most of the season. I've never been a huge Schobel fan but he proves me wrong more than he doesn't. I could see him getting 10+ sacks so don't call it a "huge hole"

                      Tight end also is not a "huge hole". Tight end is a lot like strong safety. In the extremely rare scenario where you get a true super star tight end, they are huge. But on 28 out of 32 teams in the league tight end is an after thought.

                      LB is not a "huge hole". I don't think Ellison is our long term answer, but at this point has 2 years of starting experience and our defense, despite what people keep saying, was not the reason for our 7-9 season. We held teams to low scores and lost, several times. The Bills lost 3 games in which teams scored less than 17. In 2 games vs New England the Bills gave up a total of 33 points. "Huge hole"? I don't think so.

                      I for one, as a person who watches every single game, am not as doom and gloom as everybody else is here and all these "huge holes. Lets face it, if we get a decent guard he'll be as good or better than Dockery. Peters, regardles of contract situation can't play worse than he did last year. Hangartner, could he be worse than Fowler/Preston? I think not. Brad Butler and Langston in another year together, should improve.

                      Pus TO. I'd say so far, this team has gone from a 7-9 team to a 9-7 team with the moves we've made so far. After adding a couple more good players in the draft, the continued development of guys like Poz and McKelvin, that is going to drastically improve this team.

                      But frankly, HHurricane, between your posts yesterday and today, I'm under the assumption that your HHigh because, frankly, most of them off base and ******ed.

                      Fred Jackson gonna start all year! LOL!

                      Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                      I think everyone is just keeps missing the point here.

                      We don't have the luxury at 7-9 to draft a replacement for Peters while he "rots" when we have huge holes at DE, LB, TE and LG to be filled.

                      Peters, if signed, is an asset to the team. Make him an asset not a distratction and move on towards the goal of a championship. He makes us better. He's one of the top guys at one of the most important positions in football and he crurrently resides on our roster.

                      Are you guys interested in playoffs or rebuilding because if Peters leaves we are rebuilding.

                      Walker-Butler-Hangartner-Chambers-Rookie is not taking us to the playoffs. Maybe you folks should pull the tape of Walker playing a season a LT in Oakland before you profess that we'll be just fine without Peters.

                      Comment

                      • HHURRICANE
                        Registered User
                        • Mar 2005
                        • 15490

                        #12
                        Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

                        Originally posted by The Juice Is Loose
                        The Cardinals went to the Super Bowl with Mike Gandy and a guy who was a "distraction" in Anquan Boldin.

                        You can't just make definitive statements like that because every year, teams that are "certainly" not making the playoffs, make the playoffs.
                        Okay, you don't think the Cardinals are slightly better than us?

                        We don't have the luxury of just losing good players when you finish 7-9 for the last 3 years.

                        Comment

                        • FlyingDutchman
                          Registered User
                          • Apr 2005
                          • 5074

                          #13
                          Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

                          Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                          Okay, you don't think the Cardinals are slightly better than us?

                          We don't have the luxury of just losing good players when you finish 7-9 for the last 3 years.
                          youre missing the reality of what is going on with the Peters situation.

                          Comment

                          • The Juice Is Loose
                            All-Pro Zoner
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 1341

                            #14
                            Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

                            Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                            Okay, you don't think the Cardinals are slightly better than us?

                            We don't have the luxury of just losing good players when you finish 7-9 for the last 3 years.
                            NO KIDDING! THAT'S WHY, FOR THE 3RD TIME NOW, I AM SAYING TO MAKE PETERS PLAY OUT HIS CONTRACT!

                            If he holds out, he loses money. If he holds out past week 10 we get him an extra year.

                            His only choice will be to play his best. That only helps us. I don't see the need to extend him, period.

                            Make him play out the 2 years, franchise him, and trade him in 2011.

                            Comment

                            • The Juice Is Loose
                              All-Pro Zoner
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 1341

                              #15
                              Re: A Positive Spin On The Peters Situation

                              And honestly, as far as Arizone being "better than us"...I guess. Last year. They can't run the ball better than us or play defense better than us.

                              My point was, they had a journeyman, former scrub Buffalo Bill, Mike Gandy, whom we all hated, starting at LT.

                              You don't necessarily need a pro bowler at LT. How many super bowls did Willie Roaf go to?

                              The entire harmony of the team determines the outcome. Not just one player or two.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X