LifetimesBillsfan came up with an comparison which made me think of another situation about the replacement of Peters.
Back in England, Arsenal had a young striker called Nicolas Anelka. He'd been poached from his French club for almost nothing but had been put into the starting line up and had been a star (Peters signed as a UDFA)
Immediately he started complaining about his contract and sulking and was eventually sold to Real Madrid for £23m (Peters traded to the Eagles)
This left Arsenal lightweight up front, and fans speculated on which striker the team would spend all the £23m on. (this forum)
Instead Arsenal spent £11m on Thierry Henry who was on the bench at Juventus as Wenger had spotted him earlier in this career (Finding a player at the combine and pro-day)
The remaining money was spent on other areas, strengthening the overall team. (using the higher draft picks elsewhere)
Basically although fans were clamouring for a high R1 replacement, the team had spotted their ideal replacement who would be available in R2. Reflecting on this latter, not only should Henry have been a R1 replacement but potentially the overall No1 pick and despite Juventus making a profit, they were actually fleeced and could easily have sold Henry for £20m. Arsenal subsequently turned down bids of £35m+ for Henry.
Whilst they are different sports and different systems to acquiring players, the most obvious solution as suggested by the fans and press is not always the right one.
Back in England, Arsenal had a young striker called Nicolas Anelka. He'd been poached from his French club for almost nothing but had been put into the starting line up and had been a star (Peters signed as a UDFA)
Immediately he started complaining about his contract and sulking and was eventually sold to Real Madrid for £23m (Peters traded to the Eagles)
This left Arsenal lightweight up front, and fans speculated on which striker the team would spend all the £23m on. (this forum)
Instead Arsenal spent £11m on Thierry Henry who was on the bench at Juventus as Wenger had spotted him earlier in this career (Finding a player at the combine and pro-day)
The remaining money was spent on other areas, strengthening the overall team. (using the higher draft picks elsewhere)
Basically although fans were clamouring for a high R1 replacement, the team had spotted their ideal replacement who would be available in R2. Reflecting on this latter, not only should Henry have been a R1 replacement but potentially the overall No1 pick and despite Juventus making a profit, they were actually fleeced and could easily have sold Henry for £20m. Arsenal subsequently turned down bids of £35m+ for Henry.
Whilst they are different sports and different systems to acquiring players, the most obvious solution as suggested by the fans and press is not always the right one.
Comment