We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Night Train
    Retired - On Several Levels
    • Jul 2005
    • 33117

    We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

    We have enough WR's
    We have enough RB's
    We've drafted like 10 CB's lately (so it seems)
    We're not drafting a QB
    OOOOOOOh, look at that sexy TE !


    We need...LINEMAN..on both sides of the ball.

    You know... like winning teams do. See Patriots. It's science !

    For crying out loud,I'm tired of copying the Lions (lack of) success plan.

    THE NFL IS NOT A FREAKIN' MADDEN GAME !
    Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
  • Nighthawk
    Getting old waiting for a championship in Buffalo!
    • Jul 2002
    • 15437

    #2
    Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

    Originally posted by Night Train
    We have enough WR's
    We have enough RB's
    We've drafted like 10 CB's lately (so it seems)
    We're not drafting a QB
    OOOOOOOh, look at that sexy TE !


    We need...LINEMAN..on both sides of the ball.

    You know... like winning teams do. See Patriots. It's science !

    For crying out loud,I'm tired of copying the Lions (lack of) success plan.

    THE NFL IS NOT A FREAKIN' MADDEN GAME !
    Amen!!! Now it's up this organization to prove they actually get it!

    Comment

    • X-Era
      What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
      • Feb 2005
      • 27670

      #3
      Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

      Originally posted by Night Train
      We have enough WR's
      We have enough RB's
      We've drafted like 10 CB's lately (so it seems)
      We're not drafting a QB
      OOOOOOOh, look at that sexy TE !


      We need...LINEMAN..on both sides of the ball.

      You know... like winning teams do. See Patriots. It's science !

      For crying out loud,I'm tired of copying the Lions (lack of) success plan.

      THE NFL IS NOT A FREAKIN' MADDEN GAME !
      Pettigrew is basically a 6th lineman... so that fits.

      Ohh by the way, he can catch very well too.

      I think he just might be our pick... yes it would be a shocker, yes some may think its a reach, but I would not be surprised.

      Comment

      • Nighthawk
        Getting old waiting for a championship in Buffalo!
        • Jul 2002
        • 15437

        #4
        Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

        Originally posted by EdwardsEra
        Pettigrew is basically a 6th lineman... so that fits.

        Ohh by the way, he can catch very well too.

        I think he just might be our pick... yes it would be a shocker, yes some may think its a reach, but I would not be surprised.
        And it would set this team back for years to come.

        Comment

        • RandolphDuke
          Registered User
          • Sep 2008
          • 146

          #5
          Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

          they out they damn mind if they pick a TE at 11.

          Comment

          • Nighthawk
            Getting old waiting for a championship in Buffalo!
            • Jul 2002
            • 15437

            #6
            Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

            Originally posted by RandolphDuke
            they out they damn mind if they pick a TE at 11.
            Yeah...what you said?!?!

            Comment

            • X-Era
              What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
              • Feb 2005
              • 27670

              #7
              Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

              Originally posted by Nighthawk
              And it would set this team back for years to come.
              In your opinion.

              In my opinion they already did that with the Peters move.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

                Not only that if we get on with Fine, and another mid-round TE this year whilst sorting out the lines and maybe WLB, we will be able to draft one of:

                Jermaine Gresham, Oklahoma
                Rob Gronkowski, Arizona
                Dennis Pitta, BYU

                In my opinion, all are better than Pettigrew, and Gronkowski has the ability to combine the blocking skills of his brother Dan, with the receiving skills of Cook, and Beckum.

                Gresham and Gronkowski might be legitimate Top10 picks next year.

                Comment

                • Don't Panic
                  All-Pro Zoner
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 4227

                  #9
                  Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

                  Add WLB to that Linemen wish and I'm with you 100%. We simply cannot afford to do anything with those first two picks except go two of OT, DE, WLB.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

                    If we sort out the lines this year and also WLB, maybe S, we have a decent chance of making the playoffs.

                    Next year we can go after a skill player like a top TE, and go deep into the playoffs.

                    This team will not be a contender in one draft, but if we draft cleverly it maybe in two.

                    Comment

                    • X-Era
                      What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 27670

                      #11
                      Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

                      Originally posted by Carpetbagger
                      Add WLB to that Linemen wish and I'm with you 100%. We simply cannot afford to do anything with those first two picks except go two of OT, DE, WLB.
                      On paper, I agree.

                      Comment

                      • Patti120
                        Registered User
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 2333

                        #12
                        Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

                        Casserly, Newsome and Lombardi all say that you take the best player available period, even if you don't necessarily need them.

                        Not disagreeing with this post, just sayin what some of the experts say.

                        Comment

                        • kid mickey
                          Registered User
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 738

                          #13
                          Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

                          The pick has got to be an impact pick. I don't like Pettigrew at 11 at 28 now that is a good spot, but at 11 no way. That first pick has got to be in the trenches.
                          Biggest Donte Whitner supporter on this entire message board...Maybe biggest Donte Whitner fan ever...Wish there was a white throwback out that I could get of you guessed it #20...

                          Comment

                          • Al the Bills Fan
                            Registered User
                            • Aug 2007
                            • 1187

                            #14
                            Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

                            The game is won and lost in the trenches!!! I would not be upset is we went O-line/D-line the whole 1st day. I bunch TE in with O-line by the way

                            Comment

                            • madness
                              Registered User
                              • Apr 2003
                              • 13690

                              #15
                              Re: We Need LINEMAN - Not Skill Players

                              The Patriots have only drafted 4 OL in the first three rounds in the past 10 years. The rest of their picks have been dominated by skill positions with a few DL in there.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X