If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jpdex12
    Registered User
    • Jan 2005
    • 2670

    If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

    We can't totally abondonded our needs and grab BPA on day one.

    I used McShay's seven round mock to play this out and in the first four rounds I would have had us taking:
    1a-Orakpo DT
    1b-Pettigrew TE
    2-Mack OC
    3-Freeman OLB
    4a-Lang OT
    4b-Mickens CB

    This was on a BPA basis. Not a bad draft but it will certainly leave a hole at OT and DT. As much as I'd like to see us grab Pettigrew and Mack I think our 1b and 2 picks should be based on need.

    Therefore:
    1a-Orakpo DT
    1b-Beatty OT
    2-Brace DT
    3-Robinson OG
    4a-Morrah TE
    4b-Ellison SS
    5-Shipley OG
    6-Ian Johnson RB
    7-Graham Harrell QB
    Where else would you rather be than right here right now?
  • jpdex12
    Registered User
    • Jan 2005
    • 2670

    #2
    Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

    Man, I don't know...the more I look at BPA I see four starters from day one going BPA but only three day one starters based on need and a solid back-up DT.

    Tough call.
    Where else would you rather be than right here right now?

    Comment

    • jpdex12
      Registered User
      • Jan 2005
      • 2670

      #3
      Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

      What about

      1a-Cushing
      1b-Pettigrew
      2-Barwin
      3-Caldwell
      4a-Lang

      pffff!
      Where else would you rather be than right here right now?

      Comment

      • jamze132
        Registered User
        • Jun 2003
        • 29290

        #4
        Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

        I say we trade all of our picks for first rounders next year so when we have a new coach and a new regime, they will have some talent from the get go.

        Comment

        • Dr. Lecter
          Zero for Zero!
          • Mar 2003
          • 67930

          #5
          Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

          While another DT would be nice, it is further down my list behind interior O-line, TE, DE and OLB.
          Originally posted by mysticsoto
          Lecter is right in everything he said.

          Comment

          • X-Era
            What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
            • Feb 2005
            • 27670

            #6
            Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

            Originally posted by jpdex12
            We can't totally abondonded our needs and grab BPA on day one.

            I used McShay's seven round mock to play this out and in the first four rounds I would have had us taking:
            1a-Orakpo DT
            1b-Pettigrew TE
            2-Mack OC
            3-Freeman OLB
            4a-Lang OT
            4b-Mickens CB

            This was on a BPA basis. Not a bad draft but it will certainly leave a hole at OT and DT. As much as I'd like to see us grab Pettigrew and Mack I think our 1b and 2 picks should be based on need.

            Therefore:
            1a-Orakpo DT
            1b-Beatty OT
            2-Brace DT
            3-Robinson OG
            4a-Morrah TE
            4b-Ellison SS
            5-Shipley OG
            6-Ian Johnson RB
            7-Graham Harrell QB
            I gotta disagree.

            I think players can be had throughout the draft. What I also see is that the Bills are very high on a developing OT in Bell.

            The Bills may have adopted a development plan for all prospective LT's.

            They give them a year to groom, then they giev them playing time at RT the next year, and then they move them to LT.

            Thats really a 2 to 3 year development for an OT. And thats why I have wanted us to go other routes first.

            If we had solid starters at more positions heading into this, I would agree. But with so many holes, and prospects who could start day one in those holes, like a TE, or LB, or rotational DE... Id rather spend our early picks on that this year.

            Comment

            • Yasgur's Farm
              Moderator
              • Feb 2005
              • 7091

              #7
              Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

              Bills gotta keep BPA and need balanced with every pick.

              Comment

              • ddaryl
                Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                • Jan 2005
                • 10714

                #8
                Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

                I fail to see how we are screwed with either scenario...

                We don't really need a DT. You have us taking a DE in both mocks, and OL in the 1st 3 picks... Really can't ask for more then that.

                the draft will not screw us, the last 10- 15 years of ignoring the importance of the OL and drafting DL poorly on has done that

                Comment

                • OpIv37
                  Acid Douching Asswipe
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 101230

                  #9
                  Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

                  BPA is a luxury that good teams can afford.

                  The Bills are not a good team.

                  At a minimum, the Bills have to consider need for the first 3 rounds (4 picks I believe). After that, BPA may be the better strategy, but we have some BIG holes to fill first.
                  MiKiDo Facebook
                  MiKiDo Website

                  Comment

                  • Philagape
                    WIN NOW
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 19432

                    #10
                    Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

                    The phrase BPA doesn't mean much, and here's why:

                    BPA may be different on different teams' boards

                    The real BPAs won't be known for years

                    And, with as many needs as we have, it's not hard for a need pick to be a reasonable BPA anyway
                    "It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther

                    "Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill

                    2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
                    2004 BZ Big Money League Champion

                    Comment

                    • Captain gameboy
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 14287

                      #11
                      Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

                      Jauron is on a one year leash.

                      In my view, that means draft immediate need.

                      Comment

                      • Nighthawk
                        Getting old waiting for a championship in Buffalo!
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 15437

                        #12
                        Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

                        Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                        While another DT would be nice, it is further down my list behind interior O-line, TE, DE and OLB.
                        Yeah, don't understand that pick?!?!

                        Comment

                        • jpdex12
                          Registered User
                          • Jan 2005
                          • 2670

                          #13
                          Re: If we draft BPA on our day 1 picks, we're F'ed

                          What is the concensus big need pick? DE, TE, OT or OLB?
                          Where else would you rather be than right here right now?

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X