If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
then we better trade back 1st... This in not happening. Any of OL avaialble at #11 would be a better vlaue then Pettgrew, numeorus LB's and DE's will also be a BPA over pettigew at #11
I am tired of defending against TE love fest when we are still so removed from being a playoff team...
-DE,,LB,,Tackle,CB,QB,RB,WR etc etc are skilled positions.. TE isn't. So as long as we have skilled needs then we can't afford to draft a luxery position...
--i misht warm up to it @ 28 if he we're available, but the idea of getting a slider like Everett Brown,Maybin,Other,Larry English, etc etc etc are the more responsible thing to do..I agree 1005 though that it's not the Fan-Favorite thing to do. Not this fan though..
---Your allowed to have a opinion and a voice to carry it. I don't mind & won't flame. But i do wanna share why i disagree..That's all brother...
For this is what they said about Pettigrew after the combine:
"For the supposed No1 Tight end, he didn't look like it ... he ran a horrendous 4.85 and only came up with 22 reps. Basically he didn't do anything special"
And a scouting report:
"Doesn't always play up to his talent. Too many skills to not be dominant all the time" - if he cannot be dominant at college level !!!
"Not a field stretcher"
Great, the Bills draft a lazy guy who couldn't even find the red zone last year.
For this is what they said about Pettigrew after the combine:
"For the supposed No1 Tight end, he didn't look like it ... he ran a horrendous 4.85 and only came up with 22 reps. Basically he didn't do anything special"
And a scouting report:
"Doesn't always play up to his talent. Too many skills to not be dominant all the time" - if he cannot be dominant at college level !!!
"Not a field stretcher"
Great, the Bills draft a lazy guy who couldn't even find the red zone last year.
It would be a desperately sad day if we waste this pick at #11, because with so many needs, and with depth at TE on Day2 and plenty of starting potential there, Pettigrew at #11 will be monumental waste of pick for a guy with zero speed, who doesn't play up to his ability.
Hell, if Jermaine Gresham had come out, he wouldn't even be the No1 TE in the draft.
NFL Draftcountdown have him going at #28 in their mock ... why do you want someone possibly available at #28 taken at #11 especially as he is not a core need?
Actually I find plenty of comments about guys who are being underestimated where it is said they make the most of their abilities and never take plays off.
Comment