If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Re: 6 Bills rookies listed in top 100 impact rookies
IM surprised Byrd is rated so hi, i really like the pick now that he is going to FS
Still absolutly luv the levitre and Wood pick
Maybin reminds me alot of J Taylor coming out of college
Harris cant do any worse than our LBer starter (ellison) and our depth has been here
Re: 6 Bills rookies listed in top 100 impact rookies
Originally posted by EricStratton
What type of site is WhatIfSports? Is it a message board type like this one or more news/insight type of stuff?
It's blocked at work.
It seems to be the type of place that has random musings. Most of them are probably meaningless, but I thought this might be interesting for some people.
Re: 6 Bills rookies listed in top 100 impact rookies
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
For rookie impact, not long term.
Of course, you completely ignore that the 5th round pick is in the top 100.
And you wonder why people ***** about your *****ing?
once again, what good does that do us NOW?
We needed a DE last year- we still need a DE THIS year. If Maybin is good long term, great- but we're still screwed for the moment. That's what frustrates me. I really don't understand why you don't get it.
And our 5th round pick being in the top 100 is nice, but he doesn't play DE, OLB or LT.
Re: 6 Bills rookies listed in top 100 impact rookies
Originally posted by Mahdi
Yeah, like that really means much.
it means other people share the opinion that there were other players more likely to help us now.
But that's ok- the Bills can draft a prospect and lose 3 or 4 more starters before he's in his prime and we'll be right back in the perpetual rebuilding cycle. No one except me really seems to mind.
Re: 6 Bills rookies listed in top 100 impact rookies
Originally posted by OpIv37
once again, what good does that do us NOW?
We needed a DE last year- we still need a DE THIS year. If Maybin is good long term, great- but we're still screwed for the moment. That's what frustrates me. I really don't understand why you don't get it.
And our 5th round pick being in the top 100 is nice, but he doesn't play DE, OLB or LT.
Actually our 5th round pick DOES play OLB. He will be moved from safety. He can't play all 3 positions though.
And I understand what you are saying. Why you don't want the greatest long term benefit is what I don't understand. If the Bills were one or two players away from winning it all I would agree. They are not. So why sacrifice 2 years down the road for a fake thrill of 9-7 this year?
Re: 6 Bills rookies listed in top 100 impact rookies
Originally posted by OpIv37
it means other people share the opinion that there were other players more likely to help us now.
But that's ok- the Bills can draft a prospect and lose 3 or 4 more starters before he's in his prime and we'll be right back in the perpetual rebuilding cycle. No one except me really seems to mind.
No one thought Dwight Freeney would help right away either.
Re: 6 Bills rookies listed in top 100 impact rookies
Originally posted by OpIv37
oops- he does play OLB, but he didn't in college. Another project.
You corrected yourself while I was pointing out that your rant was as accurate as a TopDog rant. But at least you caught it and admitted to it, so you are not that bad.
Re: 6 Bills rookies listed in top 100 impact rookies
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
Actually our 5th round pick DOES play OLB. He will be moved from safety. He can't play all 3 positions though.
And I understand what you are saying. Why you don't want the greatest long term benefit is what I don't understand. If the Bills were one or two players away from winning it all I would agree. They are not. So why sacrifice 2 years down the road for a fake thrill of 9-7 this year?
So, he's changing positions- ie, ANOTHER PROJECT.
It's not that I don't want long term benefit- it's that I don't trust what this team is going to do with the other positions during that time period. In 2 years we'll have our DE, but then Stroud's contract is up and we'll be clamoring for a DT to replace him, who will take two years.... etc etc etc.
Comment