Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • yordad
    Registered User
    • Dec 2007
    • 11867
    #1

    Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

    OK, the Bill smade no attempt to grab/upgrade a FB in this draft. And, with only 2 drafted, the Bills had a lot to choose from in the 7th.

    The Bills look to have targeted lineman who excell at run blocking.

    Who would you guys rather have as the 11th player on the field? First, I will list the first 10
    1. Edwards
    2. Lynch
    3. TO
    4. Evans
    5. Nelson
    6. Butler
    7. Woods
    8. Levitre
    9. Hangartner
    10. Walker

    Now, there are a number of differnet packages the Bills could use at any givem moment depending on a number of different things. There are times when Jackson would be the 11th, Fine, Hardy, Johnson, Schouman, Rhodes, Parrish, and of course Reed.

    But, how often do you think McIntyre will be the best 11th option?
    Last edited by yordad; 05-02-2009, 02:08 PM.
    "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

    "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

    "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

    "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

    "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad
    Tags: None
  • yordad
    Registered User
    • Dec 2007
    • 11867
    #2
    Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

    OK, the Bill smade no attempt to grab a FB in this draft. And, with only 2 drafted, the Bills had a lot to choose from in the 7th.

    The Bills look to have targeted lineman who excell at run blocking.

    Who would you guys rather have as the 7th player on the field? First, I will list the first 10
    1. Edwards
    2. Lynch
    3. TO
    4. Evans
    5. Nelson
    6. Butler
    7. Woods
    8. Levitre
    9. Hangartner
    10. Walker

    Now, there are a number of differnet packages the Bills could use at any givem moment depending on a number of different things. There are times when Jackson would be the 11th, Fine, Hardy, Johnson, Schouman, Rhodes, Parrish, and of course Reed.

    But, how often do you think McIntyre will be the best 11th option?
    "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

    "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

    "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

    "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

    "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad

    Comment

    • Mitchell55
      only another 1000 mocks due by tomorrow!
      • Feb 2008
      • 5214
      #3
      Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

      Id rather have McCall. But without a FB just go with Reed as a slot

      Comment

      • yordad
        Registered User
        • Dec 2007
        • 11867
        #4
        Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

        Originally posted by Mitchell55
        Id rather have McCall. But without a FB just go with Reed as a slot
        I think Reed will see the field a lot. So much so, that he is basically a starter. He will likely be subed out when the Bills are around the opposing 20 yard line though. He isn't exactly the most awesomest red zone threat.
        "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

        "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

        "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

        "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

        "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad
        • 👍 1

        Comment

        • yordad
          Registered User
          • Dec 2007
          • 11867
          #5
          Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

          How the heck was this thread created twice? Sorry Mods.
          "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

          "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

          "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

          "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

          "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad

          Comment

          • Pinkerton Security
            Pinkerton's son
            • Feb 2006
            • 6003
            #6
            Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

            we have a FB. McIntyre. hes a blocker, which is all we care about. I bet we'll see a FB just as much as we did last year.

            Comment

            • yordad
              Registered User
              • Dec 2007
              • 11867
              #7
              Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

              Originally posted by pinkdogg32
              we have a FB. McIntyre. hes a blocker, which is all we care about. I bet we'll see a FB just as much as we did last year.
              Well ok, except he sucked at blocking too.
              Last edited by yordad; 05-02-2009, 02:32 PM.
              "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

              "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

              "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

              "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

              "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad

              Comment

              • mayotm
                Registered User
                • Jul 2003
                • 2333
                #8
                Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

                I could easily see a FB not making the 53 man roster. For short yardage, they could use another position player at FB.

                Comment

                • Mitchell55
                  only another 1000 mocks due by tomorrow!
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 5214
                  #9
                  Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

                  Originally posted by mayotm
                  I could easily see a FB not making the 53 man roster. For short yardage, they could use another position player at FB.

                  Aside from Barber, Lynch is the best short yardage RB ive ever seen. Why use someone else?

                  Comment

                  • yordad
                    Registered User
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 11867
                    #10
                    Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

                    Originally posted by mayotm
                    I could easily see a FB not making the 53 man roster. For short yardage, they could use another position player at FB.
                    I wouldn't be surprised. He better excell on special teams.
                    Originally posted by Mitchell55
                    Aside from Barber, Lynch is the best short yardage RB ive ever seen. Why use someone else?
                    I think he means that Fine, or someone, could be used in a lead blocker capacity like once a weekish.
                    Last edited by yordad; 05-02-2009, 02:34 PM.
                    "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

                    "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

                    "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

                    "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

                    "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad
                    • 👍 1

                    Comment

                    • ServoBillieves
                      The Voice of Reason
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 6106
                      #11
                      Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

                      Schouman and Fine are ok at blocking out of the backfield.

                      Turk wants a lead man to mow down people for Marshawn, so I see McIntyre taking the field a lot, even if I would rather see Action in the backfield with Marshawn.
                      Bye Bye Brady...

                      Comment

                      • yordad
                        Registered User
                        • Dec 2007
                        • 11867
                        #12
                        Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

                        Originally posted by HargroveforMVP
                        Schouman and Fine are ok at blocking out of the backfield.

                        Turk wants a lead man to mow down people for Marshawn, so I see McIntyre taking the field a lot, even if I would rather see Action in the backfield with Marshawn.
                        How much mowing did you see McIntyre do last year? I seen him get in the way more then he paved one.
                        "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

                        "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

                        "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

                        "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

                        "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad

                        Comment

                        • casdhf
                          Registered User
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 17542
                          #13
                          Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

                          I think Fine will see a lot of action this year.
                          Originally posted by BillsZone Mod
                          cas,

                          I'm just letting you know that you have been given 2 points for telling Wys AKA Mark to kill himself.

                          BillsZone Mod

                          Comment

                          • McBFLO
                            Registered User
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 988
                            #14
                            Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

                            I can't see the FB being used in any situation other than short yardage or goaline packages. We just have too much talent on the offensive side of the ball to have McIntyre on the field in any other situation.
                            Infrequent poster, daily visitor.

                            Eternal optimist.

                            Follow me on twitter @CoreyMc81

                            Comment

                            • DrGraves
                              Registered User
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 2693
                              #15
                              Re: Look for the Bills to go with no FB, or one with a reduced role.

                              I want johnson on the field.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X