Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • madness
    Registered User
    • Apr 2003
    • 13690

    Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

    Although much banter has been spent on star OLT Jason Peters’ departure from Buffalo, the Bills are considerably more concerned about their ORT situation than the happenings at left tackle. They feel comfortable with converted ORT Langston Walker handling OLT duties, but they are still very unsure as to which candidate can best fill in on the right side. — Don’t expect Marshawn Lynch’s three-game suspension to be reduced in response to his appeal. We hear it would be considered a major upset for him to win the appeal and that the club is fully planning on him sitting out Weeks 1-3.


  • OpIv37
    Acid Douching Asswipe
    • Sep 2002
    • 101230

    #2
    Re: Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

    no real surprises there.
    MiKiDo Facebook
    MiKiDo Website

    Comment

    • acehole
      Registered User
      • Jan 2006
      • 4876

      #3
      Re: Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

      Which is why I wanted Loadholt in the second.


      Originally posted by madness
      Although much banter has been spent on star OLT Jason Peters’ departure from Buffalo, the Bills are considerably more concerned about their ORT situation than the happenings at left tackle. They feel comfortable with converted ORT Langston Walker handling OLT duties, but they are still very unsure as to which candidate can best fill in on the right side. — Don’t expect Marshawn Lynch’s three-game suspension to be reduced in response to his appeal. We hear it would be considered a major upset for him to win the appeal and that the club is fully planning on him sitting out Weeks 1-3.


      http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW.../afc051709.htm
      Hated by the stupid..
      Loved by their moms.

      Comment

      • WeAreArthurMoates
        Registered User
        • Feb 2009
        • 1642

        #4
        Re: Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

        PFW has no idea what it's talking about. We are not concerned about RT, if we were would of drafted Loadholt. To come out and say the next day that Butler would be the RT was not a knee jerk reaction. It was a decision they had come to when they traded away Peters. PFW gets it wrong more times than they get it right.

        Comment

        • yordad
          Registered User
          • Dec 2007
          • 11867

          #5
          Re: Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

          I am concerned, but I don't believe the Bills are all too.
          "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

          "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

          "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

          "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

          "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad

          Comment

          • Goobylal
            Registered User
            • Jan 2004
            • 19366

            #6
            Re: Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

            Yes, the Bills were so concerned, that they bypassed Michael Oher with their 11th overall pick. And Britton with their 28th pick. And Loadholt with their 2nd rounder.

            As for Lynch, if Marshall got it reduced, Lynch should as well.

            Comment

            • OpIv37
              Acid Douching Asswipe
              • Sep 2002
              • 101230

              #7
              Re: Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

              Originally posted by Goobylal
              Yes, the Bills were so concerned, that they bypassed Michael Oher with their 11th overall pick. And Britton with their 28th pick. And Loadholt with their 2nd rounder.

              As for Lynch, if Marshall got it reduced, Lynch should as well.
              because we all know the Bills' FO has NEVER passed on an offensive linemen that turned out to be good in order to select a lesser player, right?
              MiKiDo Facebook
              MiKiDo Website

              Comment

              • Romes
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 5764

                #8
                Re: Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

                I don't believe PFW.
                Originally posted by paladin warrior
                RALPH is drove me nut.

                Comment

                • Goobylal
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 19366

                  #9
                  Re: Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

                  Originally posted by OpIv37
                  because we all know the Bills' FO has NEVER passed on an offensive linemen that turned out to be good in order to select a lesser player, right?
                  If the Bills were as concerned with RT as PFW claims, they would have taken an OT somewhere in the draft.

                  Comment

                  • SeatownBillsFan21
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2004
                    • 2149

                    #10
                    Re: Bills concerned about ORT/Lynch's appeal not likely

                    PFW is trash dont read into the Bull$***. there putting out there.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X