PDA

View Full Version : Supreme Court to hear NFL Anti-Trust case



Dr. Lecter
07-22-2009, 09:26 AM
The article is kinda long, but is interesting and the impact could be huge for all of pro sports.

Fast forward to a high-definition picture of sports late in 2010. Here is the news of the day, scrawling across the bottom of your TV screen or mobile Web device:

• LeBron James, who had been expecting a free-agency bonanza when his contract with the Cleveland Cavaliers expired after the 2009-2010 season, opens the 2010-11 season with … the Cavs, the only team with the right to sign him. Cleveland retains the NBA MVP by slotting his salary into the new league-wide scale.

• Minnesota Vikings defensive coordinator Leslie Frazier, the hottest commodity for every opening in the NFL over the past six months, signs on to be the new head coach of the Dallas Cowboys … at a league-determined salary that will pay him far less than he'd have made if the Denver Broncos had chosen him over Josh McDaniels in 2009.

• The Ricketts family, new owner of the Chicago Cubs, scraps plans for its own cable channel because Major League Baseball has barred all such broadcasts, as well as webcasts, by individual teams.

• A young Detroit Red Wings fan who has saved his pennies for months shells out $300 to buy a replica sweater that would have cost him $80 in 2009.

• Lockouts and strikes loom large in all four major team sports as an era of relative peace on the sports labor front ends and owners begin to exercise their new power over player unions.

Unlikely?

Discouraging?

It could happen.

All of those scenarios, in fact, could become realities if the NFL triumphs in a case now under consideration in the U.S. Supreme Court. Experts agree that the case known as American Needle vs. NFL could easily be the most significant legal turning point in the history of American sports. If the high court rules in favor of the NFL, the development will be more important to the sports industry than Curt Flood's battle against the reserve clause in the 1970s; than baseball's collusion cases in the mid-'80s; than the NFL players union's epic fight for free agency in a series of antitrust cases that stretched over a decade; and even than the enactment of the Sports Broadcasting Act in 1961, which is the legislation that is the foundation of the NFL's television riches.

"There is nothing of more concern to me," says one veteran union official, asking for anonymity because of the pending case and the significance of the issues. "Our leverage is in the antitrust courts, and a bad decision in this case could tilt the playing field beyond recognition."

Another union leader, recognizing the significance of a win for the NFL, says wistfully, "We can only hope that the justices somehow decide that their decision to take the case for review was improvident and then decide not to make any decision."

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=munson_lester&id=4336261

Ebenezer
07-22-2009, 09:29 AM
You mean big business employers who can wield unrelenting power and crush and control their employees with the only intent to increase the bottom line and take home more money for themselves and piss on the little guy? Never happen in America.

Typ0
07-22-2009, 09:47 AM
I've been saying the blackouts violate anti-trust law for years and always thought we would see the day they were struck down by the courts. This case scares me. While they focus on labor relations in the article the effects are going to reverb much deeper into the culture of America. If the NFL is not found to be tending toward a monopoly we are screwed for years to come but in the end it might mean the end of the league. At some point people are going to wise up [I still hold out hope] and exert pressure on the NFL to correct their evil ways and the things they do to the public that is paying them.

User Manuel
07-22-2009, 11:44 AM
You mean big business employers who can wield unrelenting power and crush and control their employees with the only intent to increase the bottom line and take home more money for themselves and piss on the little guy? Never happen in America.

Eb, that has ALWAYS been America. The americans dream is very, very Darwin.

ddaryl
07-22-2009, 12:04 PM
You mean big business employers who can wield unrelenting power and crush and control their employees with the only intent to increase the bottom line and take home more money for themselves and piss on the little guy? Never happen in America.


LOL!!!! you ain't ****tin.. All of us are mere peasants and a ways to the means for the big boys....

but the difference in prosports is the players union also has large power of influence to combat, and in the end prices just go up, and less and less people have access to the game

At some point both sides are going to have to realize a downtrend in pricing... I do look forward to the big markets crashing hard do to their over zealoous stadiums and liscencing fees.. I cannot wait to hear the whines of big markets

Ebenezer
07-22-2009, 01:15 PM
Eb, that has ALWAYS been America. The americans dream is very, very Darwin.
I know that...and you know that...but there are those that would like to convince us otherwise.