Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • madness
    Registered User
    • Apr 2003
    • 13690

    Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

    Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

    By Chris Brown - Posted August 13th, 2009
    It has been communicated to me through the chain of command at One Bills Drive that the Buffalo Bills stand by their original statement that the team has no interest in adding Michael Vick to the roster at this time.
    Last edited by madness; 08-13-2009, 03:18 PM. Reason: Title
  • Mitchell55
    only another 1000 mocks due by tomorrow!
    • Feb 2008
    • 5214

    #2
    Re: Bills say no to Vick... again

    This sucks

    Comment

    • BillsWin
      man amongst boys
      • Oct 2008
      • 6025

      #3
      Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

      already been posted man. This was just a rumor on bb.com that just got way to out of hand.
      I am The Batman.

      Comment

      • SquishDaFish
        Lets GO BUFFALO!!
        • Jun 2005
        • 17034

        #4
        Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

        This was posted in the Vick thread

        Comment

        • Mr. Miyagi
          Lecter's Little Bitch

          • Sep 2002
          • 53616

          #5
          Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

          OBD just pulled the string on Chris Brown's back again.

          Comment

          • Night Train
            Retired - On Several Levels
            • Jul 2005
            • 33117

            #6
            Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

            ...At this time.

            What about..tomorrow !!!


            Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

            Comment

            • Mahdi
              Registered User
              • Mar 2004
              • 10585

              #7
              Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

              Originally posted by Night Train
              ...At this time.

              What about..tomorrow !!!


              I love how they keep saying "at this time"... keeps the door open and rumors flying.

              Comment

              • trapezeus
                Legendary Zoner
                • Oct 2004
                • 19525

                #8
                Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

                i agree, the "at this time" makes it more speculative. maybe this is the dance the team does with the vick camp to lower his price. maybe they feel like there isn't much competition for the guy and they can get him cheaper than what he's asking for. So they roll that statement out there to see if the vick camp bites.

                That's the art of the negotiation....if indeed this is a negotiation tactic.

                they might really mean it. they don't have any interest unless the bills lose all four quarterbacks against the bears. then they would be interested.

                Comment

                • Typ0
                  honey pie
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 32592

                  #9
                  Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

                  If TE goes down would you rather have RF DH or MV?

                  Comment

                  • madness
                    Registered User
                    • Apr 2003
                    • 13690

                    #10
                    Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

                    Originally posted by Typ0
                    If TE goes down would you rather have RF DH or MV?
                    EMT

                    Comment

                    • Typ0
                      honey pie
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 32592

                      #11
                      Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

                      Originally posted by madness
                      EMT

                      yeah, well if he needs EMT we're going to have RF. Remember what happened last year when JP came in?

                      Comment

                      • madness
                        Registered User
                        • Apr 2003
                        • 13690

                        #12
                        Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

                        Originally posted by Typ0
                        yeah, well if he needs EMT we're going to have RF. Remember what happened last year when JP came in?
                        You're comparing RF to JP?

                        Comment

                        • Joe Fo Sho
                          Making Spirits Bright
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 6194

                          #13
                          Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

                          BRING HIM IN!!!

                          Comment

                          • SquishDaFish
                            Lets GO BUFFALO!!
                            • Jun 2005
                            • 17034

                            #14
                            Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

                            Originally posted by Joe Fo Sho
                            BRING HIM IN!!!
                            You just HAD to go into every thread with that nonsense?

                            Comment

                            • Joe Fo Sho
                              Making Spirits Bright
                              • Mar 2006
                              • 6194

                              #15
                              Re: Bills reiterate stance on Michael Vick

                              Originally posted by BEASTMODE
                              You just HAD to go into every thread with that nonsense?
                              Well if there wasn't so many friggin threads, I wouldn't have to.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X