Lankster, our punt returner?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TigerJ
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 22575

    Lankster, our punt returner?

    This is kind of a followup to earlier threads pointing to an old article highlighting Ellis Lankster's athleticism and experience as a college CB and returner.

    Chris Brown is reporting that Lankster may get an opportunity to return punts on Saturday versus the Steelers.



    I'm glad to hear they're at least exploring the idea. If Lankster makes the team, he's not going to get a lot of time on the field as a CB despite being an interception machine at training camp. If he proves to be a solid punt returner, that could be a good option should Roscoe Parrish find himself the odd man out at WR. I wonder too about kick returns. You don't generally want to expose your starting CBs (McGee and McKelvin) to injury by having them return a lot of kicks, even though we know both are pretty talented return men.
    Last edited by TigerJ; 08-28-2009, 11:47 AM.
    I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

    I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
  • bigbub2352
    Registered User
    • Feb 2005
    • 5386

    #2
    Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

    if he does well could fuel parrish trade talks as well
    XTRA CRISPY XTRA SAUCEY

    Comment

    • yordad
      Registered User
      • Dec 2007
      • 11867

      #3
      Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

      Good news Tiger.
      Last edited by yordad; 08-28-2009, 12:18 PM.
      "Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad

      "I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad

      "Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad

      "Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad

      "I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad

      Comment

      • psubills62
        Legendary Zoner
        • Sep 2008
        • 11295

        #4
        Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

        Originally posted by bigbub2352
        if he does well could fuel parrish trade talks as well
        Eh, not so sure about that. I don't think this is anything signficant, just another reason for Lankster to show why he should make the team as depth in multiple places.

        If anyone is going to replace Parrish at punt returns, it would be McKelvin. That was his specialty in college (I believe 7 of his 8 TD returns in college were off of punts). I'd guess McGee or someone else could replace McKelvin on kick returns. Fred Jackson also did very well last year in place of an injured Parrish.

        If Parrish doesn't show anything this year, he's become expendable at his one area of specialty.
        "Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
        - Nicholas Cummings

        Comment

        • Michael82
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 82330

          #5
          Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

          This is great to hear. When I heard he returned kicks and punts in college, it really made me wonder why the **** they weren't using him there in the first few pre-season games instead of Bruce Hall, who won't make the roster.

          Comment

          • Hemlepp53
            Registered User
            • Jul 2004
            • 1455

            #6
            Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

            Toss him out there and see what he brings to the table in regards to the return game....
            @Hemlepp53

            Comment

            • madness
              Registered User
              • Apr 2003
              • 13690

              #7
              Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

              Word is Parrish was our #2 last week to showcase his skills for teams interested.

              Now it looks like he isn't going anywhere.

              Comment

              • Typ0
                honey pie
                • Jul 2002
                • 32592

                #8
                Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

                or we're going to cut him.

                Comment

                • Ebenezer
                  Give me a minute...
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 73868

                  #9
                  Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

                  Originally posted by Mikey82
                  This is great to hear. When I heard he returned kicks and punts in college, it really made me wonder why the **** they weren't using him there in the first few pre-season games instead of Bruce Hall, who won't make the roster.
                  based on his play last week Lankster isn't making the team, either.




                  For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

                  Comment

                  • mysticsoto
                    Too sober for this...
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 31439

                    #10
                    Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

                    Originally posted by Ebenezer
                    based on his play last week Lankster isn't making the team, either.
                    Lankster showed much more potential in the previous game than Bruce Hall has ever shown. In any case, we are stacked at RB. We may or may not be keeping McGee next year, in which case, Lankster's development becomes much more crucial. Lastly, Hall wasn't drafted. Lankster was, likely meaning the coaches view him alot higher in terms of potential...

                    Comment

                    • trapezeus
                      Legendary Zoner
                      • Oct 2004
                      • 19525

                      #11
                      Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

                      parrish would be even better on a team that forces the opposing team to punt.

                      Comment

                      • Michael82
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 82330

                        #12
                        Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

                        Originally posted by Ebenezer
                        based on his play last week Lankster isn't making the team, either.
                        based on last week, 90% of the team deserves to be cut.

                        Comment

                        • Mr. Pink
                          Peterman Sucks!
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 35303

                          #13
                          Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

                          Sounds like a sign that the Bills are really willing to let Roscoe take his wares elsewhere.

                          Comment

                          • thenry20
                            Registered User
                            • Jan 2004
                            • 844

                            #14
                            Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

                            I don't think this'll make him field all punts when the season starts but would add much needed depth if he proves to be exceptional at this. Once again the coaching staff is slow to discover what our boys are good at. Since Roscoe doesn't get much PT, why not use him to return kicks as well? I know Leodis is great here but why risk him to injury since he's going to be a starter now? I'm surprised we haven't tried those young WR's in these two roles up to this point.

                            Comment

                            • jamze132
                              Registered User
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 29290

                              #15
                              Re: Lankster, our punt returner?

                              Originally posted by psubills62
                              Eh, not so sure about that. I don't think this is anything signficant, just another reason for Lankster to show why he should make the team as depth in multiple places.

                              If anyone is going to replace Parrish at punt returns, it would be McKelvin. That was his specialty in college (I believe 7 of his 8 TD returns in college were off of punts). I'd guess McGee or someone else could replace McKelvin on kick returns. Fred Jackson also did very well last year in place of an injured Parrish.

                              If Parrish doesn't show anything this year, he's become expendable at his one area of specialty.
                              Sorry but I don't want my starters returning kicks or punts. I am hoping that Lankster can return some kicks too but I don't know about that one.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X