Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

[Mitchell55]

Im being 100% serious. He has been outplayed in every game. You may say he had 3 INTs, but all came on bad throws right to him nothing special. He was dominated in all of the preseason games.

[SpillerThrills]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

and who would you rather put out there?

[rcd333]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

whos gonna start over him?

[OpIv37]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

Lankster, after all, he had 3 INT's playing against 3rd stringers.

[Novacane]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

unreal

[DMBcrew36]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

Im being 100% serious. He has been outplayed in every game. You may say he had 3 INTs, but all came on bad throws right to him nothing special. He was dominated in all of the preseason games.

McGee hasn't looked like much of a stalwart, either, though.

[BillsFanInMass]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

That int in the bears game was all him he was covering hester i believe i was a thing of beauty.

[OpIv37]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

McGee hasn't looked like much of a stalwart, either, though.

That settles it then. Lankster and Youboty can start, Corner and Florence can fight it out for nickel, and McGee and McKelvin can fight it out for the 5th corner spot. They both return kicks, so loser gets cut. Problem solved.

[casdhf]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

lord, please give me the patience to persevere.

[yordad]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

I thought McKelvin actually played pretty good last night. He had good coverage on the completed passes. He even hit one guy and made him land out of bounds. I think he will be just fine.

It's the pass rush I am worried about. No CB looks good after 5 seconds.

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

Mitchell, Leodis is likely going to be the Bills best player on defense later this year or next year. The guy actually looks like he could be a star in the making.

[BillsWin]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

go to bed Mitchell youve got school in the morning.

[DMBcrew36]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

That settles it then. Lankster and Youboty can start, Corner and Florence can fight it out for nickel, and McGee and McKelvin can fight it out for the 5th corner spot. They both return kicks, so loser gets cut. Problem solved.

eek. Just b/c McGee hasn't been overly solid ofcourse doesn't mean alternatives are any better. McGee and McKelvin are our best options, I feel. They'd look a hell of a lot better (as our whole defense would) if our defensive ends can crack some red bulls and pressure the QB more than once per half.

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

eek. Just b/c McGee hasn't been overly solid ofcourse doesn't mean alternatives are any better. McGee and McKelvin are our best options, I feel. They'd look a hell of a lot better (as our whole defense would) if our defensive ends can crack some red bulls and pressure the QB more than once per half.

:sarcasm:

[psubills62]

Re: Can we stop saying mckelvin should start?

McKelvin has been hit or miss, but he's shown flashes of being a very good CB. And honestly, are you telling me that EVERY interception made by EVERY other CB is a result of good coverage instead of a horrible QB throw? Sorry, I don't believe it. You could probably say the same for a lot of other INT's made during the preseason. Also, he did have good coverage on Hester. He also did very well last night covering the quick passes the Steelers used at times. He came up very fast and made the tackle on Sweed one of the times.