If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Is it crazy to think the Bills may have kept Hamden because....
Is it crazy to think the Bills may have kept Hamden because....
I mean, Hamden looked pretty good in limited action thought out the preseason. But, if the Bills cut him, would another team have picked him up? If not, we could have just put him on call. Actually, I believe the Bills did that once.
Do you think another team would have picked him up? But the real question is, do you think the most likely team would have been the Patriots?
"Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad
"I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad
"Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad
"Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad
"I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad
Re: Is it crazy to think the Bills may have kept Hamden because....
There's been at least a handful of teams that only kept 2 QB's this season as of today. Off the top of my head, I know the Giants and Saints are two of them.
I tend to agree here. I dont think Hamden should've made the 53-man roster and if I were GM I'd have started with two quarterbacks.
Then again, the way Trent goes down Hamden is literally two plays away from playing.
It's regardless that Rhodes release was 100% financial, despite what I thought initially. Rhodes is more valuable to this team than Hamden, Corto or freegin Wendling. Especially with Lynch missing nearly a quarter of the season.
Re: Is it crazy to think the Bills may have kept Hamden because....
Originally posted by FunTimesYaY!
The most likely reason we kept Hamdan is because most teams keep 3 QBs on the roster.
Hamdan vs Baker...tough call.
I think you are referring to teams with promising young guys as 3s. Or teams with savvy vets as 3s. Or guys with a higher likelihood of getting another gig. Again, the Bills have done this with Hamden before.
Re: Is it crazy to think the Bills may have kept Hamden because....
I just read the Saints cut Harrington who was competing for the #2 position. I think they only have 2 now. Harrington has to have a higher chance of being picked up then Hamden, right?
"Heck, now I am glad his overrated arce made the pro bowl, else we would have only got a 3rd." ~ yordad
"I've just been hit with a piece of sky. " ~ yordad
"Forgive my opinion, but...." ~ yordad
"Warning: I might be hammered." ~ yordad
"I don't care if the word is "your" or "you're", so buzz off. Its (it's) a frickin(') message board." ~ yordad
Re: Is it crazy to think the Bills may have kept Hamden because....
I don't think the Pats would be interested in Hamden.
Brian Hoyer had a strong preseason and is a good developmental prospect for them. They do have a need for a backup, but they need a veteran.
My guess is the Pats are going to wait until after week 1 and sign Damon Huard. He already knows their system and can be brought up to speed quickly, plus he is a good lockerroom guy who is friends with Brady and knows his role. By waiting until after week 1 his full salary is not guaranteed for the season.
Tweet
" ~ yordad
Comment