If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Here's what I figure: The Bills decided that Demetrius Bell is the real deal and close enough to being ready that he wouldn't be any worse than Walker, who isn't a very good left tackle. The Bills think Brad Butler is probably as good a right tackle as Walker and did not want to relegate him to the bench. That left them with the option of keeping Walker as a very high priced bench warmer, or dumping him. Obviously, their plan has for at least a week been to cut Chambers in a calculated risk to try and get something for Walker. With no takers, they bit the bullet (dead cap money) and dumped Walker.
I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
Here's what I figure: The Bills decided that Demetrius Bell is the real deal and close enough to being ready that he wouldn't be any worse than Walker, who isn't a very good left tackle. The Bills think Brad Butler is probably as good a right tackle as Walker and did not want to relegate him to the bench. That left them with the option of keeping Walker as a very high priced bench warmer, or dumping him. Obviously, their plan has for at least a week been to cut Chambers in a calculated risk to try and get something for Walker. With no takers, they bit the bullet (dead cap money) and dumped Walker.
3 million for s starting RT or LT. That's some big money. Maybe the team needs to move.
3 million for s starting RT or LT. That's some big money. Maybe the team needs to move.
3 million is very reasonable for a starter, but pricey for a bench warmer, which I think the Bills coaching staff decided he was going to be if they hadn't cut him.
I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
This wasnt a money move. The Bills are not making cuts at this point based on money.
If that's the case, then why was Copeland Bryan cut in favor of the underperforming Chris Kelsay. The Bills could've saved more money by cuttin kelsay and keeping Bryan than they did by cutting Walker and bringing back Chambers.
This wasnt a money move. The Bills are not making cuts at this point based on money.
If that's the case, then why was Copeland Bryan cut in favor of the underperforming Chris Kelsay. The Bills could've saved more money by cuttin kelsay and keeping Bryan than they did by cutting Walker and bringing back Chambers.
Maybe Ralph is a racist. At this point nothing would shock me.
All I know is that 3 million for a guy that plays either LT or RT better than Chambers or Butler is a good deal.
When one of these guys goes down, and they will, than what?
Comment