If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Why is their such a lovefest with Runyan. Walker knows our offense and played well at RT last year. Well enough that they wanted him to play Left Tackle.
Now he's not good enough to play RT? Where is the logic on this one?
Runyan's historical performance, plus the fact Walker was cut Because, (a) his performance sucked, (b) he somehow managed to gain weightt, (c) his lack of stamina isn't a good match for the no huddle. The Bills aren't going to say what they said and bring him back.
From what I read and heard around the intertubes, it wasn't only the no huddle - they wanted to move the tackles around and pull them on running plays more, which I think we've seen and they felt walker couldn't handle that.
For all you or anyone else knows, that could be BS, but one thing is certain, Runyan has played at a higher caliber than Walker for a lot longer - whether that makes him a better fit remains to be seen, but it is a logical reason for believing he's better than walker.
walker is flat out bad when we are running the no huddle. He lacks the stamina to keep up. He's not a bad tackle in a offense that huddle's up, but once the 3rd and 4th quarters rolled around he would be a huge liability on our line....especially in close games.
I prefer sticking with Jonathan Scott and getting a new backup.
That can still be Runyan.. He won't be anywheres near game shape for a few weeks... so Scott wil stil be starting. Not to mention Runyan would need to learn the playbook
He is the best option out there and provides solid depth and a vet prescence
If Walker was a bad attitude, Runyan can provide some solid mentoring for this young OL that was probably missing while the Walker experment failed...
That can still be Runyan.. He won't be anywheres near game shape for a few weeks... so Scott wil stil be starting. Not to mention Runyan would need to learn the playbook
He is the best option out there and provides solid depth and a vet prescence
If Walker was a bad attitude, Runyan can provide some solid mentoring for this young OL that was probably missing while the Walker experment failed...
Why is their such a lovefest with Runyan. Walker knows our offense and played well at RT last year. Well enough that they wanted him to play Left Tackle.
Now he's not good enough to play RT? Where is the logic on this one?
What is the proof that Runyan is better?
I thought you were smart enough to realize why Walker is a bad fit for RT in this offense...
Tweet
Comment