Tweet
I thought Jauron said they were looking at adding someone?
-
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
I wouldn't mind adding Runyan as a backup.
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
What makes you think they won't?
Guys are usually signed on Tuesday or Wednesday.Originally posted by mysticsotoComment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
they're trying to clear cap space first.Originally posted by yordad
Comment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
Kwame Harris would be a solid pick up.. still young, plenty of starting experience, very athletic, has played well in the zone blocking scheme.
He struggled with the Raiders a bit as a LT. He is a better fit as a RT.Comment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
I dont know if i am the first person saying this? but how the hell did Kirk Chambers fall so out of grace?
He started at LT for Peters last yr and did a fine job, also spot duty thruout the season he did well
He should be the starter there and Scott the backup
chambers plays nasty and is the same size as Butler
dont understand his fall form grace
weird
he got cut and guys like Corto and Mcyntyre and now Jenkins kept there roster spotsXTRA CRISPY XTRA SAUCEYComment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
He started in place of Walker, Walker played in Peters place.Originally posted by bigbub2352Comment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
Because we didn't do it immediately, dammit. Don't you know these things have to be done at the absolute convenience of the fans, before inconvenient details like negotiations, contracts, physicals and all that other minutia are taken care of?Originally posted by Dr.LecterShould have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Comment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
and regardless whether the player actually wants to play for the Bills or not....hard for some Bills fans to believe but there are actually players that would rather stay retired than play for the Bills.Originally posted by Jan Reimers
For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.Comment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
Originally posted by Jan Reimers
that's right. i'm getting impatient. tell the FO to chop chop....Originally posted by yordadComment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
I guess someones friend in the organization forgot to tell him it's not that easy .Originally posted by Jan ReimersComment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
exactlyOriginally posted by PECKERWOOD
my badXTRA CRISPY XTRA SAUCEYComment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
Originally posted by Ebenezer
Both players that are availble, Runyan and Walker are 100% signable.
It's really whether the Bills want to take the cheap way out...again and play what they have. If you are telling me that Chambers and Scott are better than Walker or Runyan than I'm not sure what to say at this point.Comment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
Aren't the Bills practicing today for Sunday?Originally posted by Jan Reimers
Wouldn't it make sense to have the player on the field getting ready with the team?Comment
-
Re: So we aren't going to add a RT?
Did you tell Runyan and Walker we all said "hi" when you talked to them?Originally posted by HHURRICANE
Besides, with you complaints abotu conditioning isn't a tad bit hypocritical to want Walker back?
And if the two players are awesome, why have not the 31 teams with better FOs than the Bills scooped them up?
And are you aware that cost is a logical consideration to take into account for a team's back-ups?Originally posted by mysticsotoComment
Comment