Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheBrownBear
    Registered User
    • Dec 2004
    • 1877

    Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

    It's plain to see that Edwards doesn't have what it takes to be anything other than an NFL backup or caretaker qb at best. He can start the rest of the season, but Bills need to address this need in the draft or free agency or they will be stuck in the cycle of losing indefinitely.

    Also, F-you Jauron. Biggest god-d@mn joke in the NFL.

    AVP - you called a real sh#tty game today.

    Roscoe - you suck.

    Ralph - (I really want to say "please die already" but that's evil so I'll stick with a) YOU SUCK!

    The D played hard for 50+ minutes - so props to them. I'd roll over too once it became apparent that my quarterback was incapable of putting points on the board.

    O-line sucked ass today, but they get a pass since they are young and just lost their best starter.

    Owens and Evans should be chewing out Edwards ass this week. God d@mn...those are two very good receivers and Edwards can't even toss a ball their way? Sh#t!
  • Dr. Pepper
    Registered User
    • Apr 2008
    • 931

    #2
    Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

    fire jauron, draft colt mccoy

    Comment

    • Captain gameboy
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 14287

      #3
      Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

      I don't think you have "what it takes," Brown Bear.

      Edwards is the least of our problems.

      Comment

      • Luisito23
        Men Have Superbowl Gold, Legends Have Platinum Hearts!!!
        • Apr 2003
        • 7433

        #4
        Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

        Originally posted by gameboy
        Edwards is the least of our problems.

        So I guess scoring doesn't count?
        "Expect rejection, but expect more to overcome it."
        ***Marv Levy.***


        "Coach Levy is one of the most inspirational people that I have ever known."
        ***Thurman Thomas.***


        "You're not going to find a more classier, down-to-Earth person away from the field than Marv Levy. He's a guy who's pretty much made me what I am today as far as a professional player and a person."
        ***Jim Kelly***


        Marv Levy's Website

        Comment

        • TheBrownBear
          Registered User
          • Dec 2004
          • 1877

          #5
          Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

          Originally posted by gameboy
          I don't think you have "what it takes," Brown Bear.

          Edwards is the least of our problems.
          You're entitled to your opinion, but can you please expound? Why do you think the offense is incapable of getting it done against a mediocre defense at home? Yeah, the o-line stunk today, I'll give you that. But if it's not Edwards, is it the playcalling? Why can't Edwards get Owens and Evans the ball? Sh$t, JP sucked ass and he still was able to get Evans the ball.
          Last edited by TheBrownBear; 09-27-2009, 06:29 PM.

          Comment

          • Mahdi
            Registered User
            • Mar 2004
            • 10585

            #6
            Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

            Originally posted by gameboy
            I don't think you have "what it takes," Brown Bear.

            Edwards is the least of our problems.
            Edwards is problem #1.... I bet Evans and Owens would agree.

            Comment

            • sdbillsfan2
              Registered User
              • Apr 2005
              • 1164

              #7
              Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

              Originally posted by gameboy
              I don't think you have "what it takes," Brown Bear.

              Edwards is the least of our problems.
              Your kidding aren't you?

              Buffalo Comp Att Yds Pct Y/A Sack YdsL TD Int Rating
              T. Edwards 20 35 156 57.1 4.5 4 27 0 1 56.4



              What part of those stats support we can't do better with someone else?
              Hell , how much worse could Fitz or Hambone done ?

              Dick, should be gone ASAP and he can take Captain Crunchless with him !

              4.5 yards ave. I can't believe it!
              Last edited by sdbillsfan2; 09-27-2009, 06:32 PM.

              " I'd try to see things from your point of view but..........there's only room up your a** for one head ! "

              Comment

              • Captain gameboy
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 14287

                #8
                Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

                Originally posted by TheBrownBear
                You're entitled to your opinion, but can you please extrapolate. Why do you think the offense is incapable of getting it done against a mediocre defense at home? Yeah, the o-line stunk today, I'll give you that. But if it's not Edwards, is it the playcalling? Why can't Edwards get Owens and Evans the ball? Sh$t, JP sucked ass and he still was able to get Evans the ball.
                Edward hit what was given, mostly, and that included spending the entire fourth quarter trying to be Ozzie Smith fielding ground ball snaps.

                This offense has serious trouble with wide receiver and tight end passing production, and serious production problems overall.

                You want to hang that on TE, fine.

                I don't.

                Comment

                • TheBrownBear
                  Registered User
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 1877

                  #9
                  Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

                  Originally posted by gameboy
                  Edward hit what was given, mostly, and that included spending the entire fourth quarter trying to be Ozzie Smith fielding ground ball snaps.

                  This offense has serious trouble with wide receiver and tight end passing production, and serious production problems overall.

                  You want to hang that on TE, fine.

                  I don't.
                  Tight end passing production has been pretty solid.

                  I think playcalling and the general mentality of Jauron is a big problem too.

                  But I think Edwards is just as big of a problem as the playcalling.

                  Agree to disagree, I guess.

                  Comment

                  • Captain gameboy
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 14287

                    #10
                    Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

                    Originally posted by sdbillsfan2
                    Your kidding aren't you?

                    Buffalo Comp Att Yds Pct Y/A Sack YdsL TD Int Rating
                    T. Edwards 20 35 156 57.1 4.5 4 27 0 1 56.4



                    What part of those stats support we can't do better with someone else?
                    Hell , how much worse could Fitz or Hambone done ?

                    Dick, should be gone ASAP and he can take Captain Crunchless with him ! with him.

                    4.5 yards ave. I can't believe it!
                    Ya. I'm kidding.

                    Watch every second half replay.

                    Note how open our WR's were. See any?

                    Note how well the snaps were delivered. See any?


                    Stats are results

                    Comment

                    • Captain gameboy
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 14287

                      #11
                      Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

                      Originally posted by TheBrownBear
                      Tight end passing production has been pretty solid.

                      I think playcalling and the general mentality of Jauron is a big problem too.

                      But I think Edwards is just as big of a problem as the playcalling.

                      Agree to disagree, I guess.
                      Sure. Its Edwards.

                      Notice how Lee and TO were running free. Replay after replay. Wide open.

                      Note how well the no huddle was operating; crisp snaps, nice line play. Purposeful, effective motion, freeing up skill players.

                      Ya. It must have been Trent.

                      Maybe next Tuesday we can have him field ground balls all day to make it more effective, because that's what he was doing the entire fourth quarter.

                      Comment

                      • sdbillsfan2
                        Registered User
                        • Apr 2005
                        • 1164

                        #12
                        Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

                        Last couple of years we listened to all the Losman excuses, this must be the year for Trent. Why is it only in Buffalo these things happen? The Steelers get Big Ben, that works out for them , Falcon and Raven seem to do okay with Ryan and Flacco. Now the Jets are 3-0 with a rookie. But In Buffalo ,it NEVER Trent's fault?
                        Yeah he has a young line. If the snaps are low, anticipate, adjust ,
                        I so friggin sick of all the excuses and year in and year out we end up with second rate crap!

                        " I'd try to see things from your point of view but..........there's only room up your a** for one head ! "

                        Comment

                        • trapezeus
                          Legendary Zoner
                          • Oct 2004
                          • 19525

                          #13
                          Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

                          edwards has more good games than bad ones...this wasn't good. but it wasn't problematic. His stats look like some of JP's best. And we still have a slew of people who wanted to give him another chance.

                          The game turned on that bizarre interception...but that drive was moving.

                          Trent gets the year for his evaluation. I think he checks down a lot, but like i've said, evans just isn't a number 1. even with his pal losman he only got a bomb or two and had good yards, but he wasn't a third down receiver that you can go to in the clutch. he's a luxury. He's fast...but he's taken out with a safety

                          this game could have been different if lynch was able to play. in the first half, jackson was moving the ball well. you bring in a fresh marshawn, and that offense might have openned the deep play up.

                          Comment

                          • Typ0
                            honey pie
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 32592

                            #14
                            Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

                            I don't have a problem with the check downs but he's doing it too quick before the play has a chance to develop. He is struggling right now and it's definately not pretty.

                            Comment

                            • Meathead
                              Insufferable prick and perpetual crybaby
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 21349

                              #15
                              Re: Quick Take: Edwards isn't our guy

                              man talk about what have you done for me lately

                              edwards plays two strong games and one weak but not disaster one, and youre calling for his head?!??

                              wow
                              One set of rules for all in the beloved community

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X