The only question is where?
Sorry. I read a lot of these negative comments, and as often happens, I see no real insight. Just a bunch of "he played bad so he sucks at everything and i hate him" we get everytime someone ****s up.
Most of the biggest complainers where the same ones who claimed to be big supporters not that long ago.
Heard the same thing about how McKelvin stinks and they never would have drafted him after week 1.
I don't sway with whichever way the wind blows.
I STILL see potential in Trent. I think he can be a good starting QB. But I don't think he can be a good starting QB 1- with these coaches and 2- with a line this bad.
The kid wasn't a polished star coming out. He was a project with excellent intangibles. And that's what he STILL is. He struggles reading the 3-4. He struggles with confidence. But he is far brighter and has bigger awareness than Losman ever had. I never saw anything in Losman... not from day 1.
If this team could give him some better protection (it looked good the first 2 weeks, but it was unacceptable to let him play with Scott and Chambers) and most of all the Jauron and Co team.
I have no issue calling out a crappy player. I've questioned Whitner for 2 years. I've hated playing Ellison from Day 1. Losman too. Always HATED the hiring of Jauron.... I called signing TO a ticket selling move that would have no positive impact the day it happened (and I LIKE T.O. ... just that with Dick and this O, h was NEVER gonna be happy) So it's not that I'm a homer.
I think he CAN be fixed still (though he is teetering on the edge of having unfixable bad habits, if he isn't soon taught correctly), IF we get some legit coaching.
Otherwise I'm beting we will be letting him go, he;ll end up a backup on a team with a starting QB and some GOOD coaching, eventually get his shot to start through injury or something and end up surprising everyone.
Flame away. I won't argue he didn't played poorly. But I think there is a very legitmate reason.
Sorry. I read a lot of these negative comments, and as often happens, I see no real insight. Just a bunch of "he played bad so he sucks at everything and i hate him" we get everytime someone ****s up.
Most of the biggest complainers where the same ones who claimed to be big supporters not that long ago.
Heard the same thing about how McKelvin stinks and they never would have drafted him after week 1.
I don't sway with whichever way the wind blows.
I STILL see potential in Trent. I think he can be a good starting QB. But I don't think he can be a good starting QB 1- with these coaches and 2- with a line this bad.
The kid wasn't a polished star coming out. He was a project with excellent intangibles. And that's what he STILL is. He struggles reading the 3-4. He struggles with confidence. But he is far brighter and has bigger awareness than Losman ever had. I never saw anything in Losman... not from day 1.
If this team could give him some better protection (it looked good the first 2 weeks, but it was unacceptable to let him play with Scott and Chambers) and most of all the Jauron and Co team.
I have no issue calling out a crappy player. I've questioned Whitner for 2 years. I've hated playing Ellison from Day 1. Losman too. Always HATED the hiring of Jauron.... I called signing TO a ticket selling move that would have no positive impact the day it happened (and I LIKE T.O. ... just that with Dick and this O, h was NEVER gonna be happy) So it's not that I'm a homer.
I think he CAN be fixed still (though he is teetering on the edge of having unfixable bad habits, if he isn't soon taught correctly), IF we get some legit coaching.
Otherwise I'm beting we will be letting him go, he;ll end up a backup on a team with a starting QB and some GOOD coaching, eventually get his shot to start through injury or something and end up surprising everyone.
Flame away. I won't argue he didn't played poorly. But I think there is a very legitmate reason.
Comment