Why only 2 WRs?
Is there a reason we only use 2 WR's primarily? Josh Reed hardly sees the field anymore and Stevie is inactive. Roscoe is useless on this team and obviously wants to be gone.
Why not grant his wish, activate Stevie and use 3-4 WR sets to spread out the defense? And by the way, tell the WR's to not run a single route before the first down marker so Captain Checkdown has to at least throw the ball beyond the 1st down.
With Hardy coming off injury and saying he is ready to play, that gives us Lee, TO, Reed, Johnson, and Hardy....Parrish and Jenkins can go elsewhere. Let Lankster or Omon return kicks and punts.
There is no reason for Stevie to be inactive while Jenkins and Parrish are active, and there is no reason for a single WR to run a route shorter than the line of scrimmage. Force trent to throw the ball beyond the line, or take him out. Stevie and Hardy and Reed can run the intermediate routes while TO and Lee are outside..spreading the D.
Is there a reason we only use 2 WR's primarily? Josh Reed hardly sees the field anymore and Stevie is inactive. Roscoe is useless on this team and obviously wants to be gone.
Why not grant his wish, activate Stevie and use 3-4 WR sets to spread out the defense? And by the way, tell the WR's to not run a single route before the first down marker so Captain Checkdown has to at least throw the ball beyond the 1st down.
With Hardy coming off injury and saying he is ready to play, that gives us Lee, TO, Reed, Johnson, and Hardy....Parrish and Jenkins can go elsewhere. Let Lankster or Omon return kicks and punts.
There is no reason for Stevie to be inactive while Jenkins and Parrish are active, and there is no reason for a single WR to run a route shorter than the line of scrimmage. Force trent to throw the ball beyond the line, or take him out. Stevie and Hardy and Reed can run the intermediate routes while TO and Lee are outside..spreading the D.
Comment