I'm coming round to the idea of sticking with the 4-3, but having a more aggressive defence as practised by the late Jim Johnson of the Eagles, the master of the blitz rather than the lame Tampa2.
With so many teams moving to a 3-4 defence, there is bound to be an excessive premium paid on these players either in Free Agency or in the draft.
We may actually find that not only is our current roster better suited to the 4-3 and might wlecome a more aggressive attitude, but that we'll also find better value now that more teams are searching for 3-4 type players.
This might be especially true with 4-3 ends who are not able to make the move to 3-4 OLB as well as DTs not big enough to be NTs nor nimble enough to be 3-4 Ends.
With so many teams moving to a 3-4 defence, there is bound to be an excessive premium paid on these players either in Free Agency or in the draft.
We may actually find that not only is our current roster better suited to the 4-3 and might wlecome a more aggressive attitude, but that we'll also find better value now that more teams are searching for 3-4 type players.
This might be especially true with 4-3 ends who are not able to make the move to 3-4 OLB as well as DTs not big enough to be NTs nor nimble enough to be 3-4 Ends.
Comment