PDA

View Full Version : Brown blogs again (not much though)


ddaryl
01-05-2010, 11:59 AM
Bottom line is Chris doesn't have a clue like the rest of us... He only could tell us Cowher was not "there" today in a post on the official forums... He obvioulsy cannot confirm or deny anything in regards to Cowher's interest... or anything else it seems


http://blogs.buffalobills.com/2010/01/05/cowhers-interest-still-up-for-debate/




Cowher’s interest still up for debate

Chris Brown
Posted January 5th, 2010
Tags: Bill Cowher (http://blogs.buffalobills.com/tag/bill-cowher/)
Some national reporters have said Bill Cowher will stay behind the CBS TV desk in 2010. Others aren’t so sure.
NFL.com’s Jason LaCanfora believes Cowher is still seriously considering coaching options, but those options appear to be few and far between, which should benefit Buffalo. Without competition from the likes of Tampa, Chicago, Houston and at this point Carolina, Cowher doesn’t have another team to leverage against Buffalo.
LaCanfora is reporting that Cowher is reaching out to potential assistants (http://blogs.nfl.com/2010/01/05/cowher-still-actively-weighing-coaching-options/) for his staff should he land a coaching gig.
RockStar36
01-05-2010, 12:03 PM
If there is one thing I've learned in the past, it's that you never read Chris Brown for accurate late-breaking news. He will only say/post/write whatever the Bills authorize.
ddaryl
01-05-2010, 12:07 PM
If there is one thing I've learned in the past, it's that you never read Chris Brown for accurate late-breaking news. He will only say/post/write whatever the Bills authorize.

or at best he regurgitates what has already been passsed around.

He did howver tell us that Cowher was not "there" today.. what that exactly means was completely up to translation
jmb1099
01-05-2010, 12:42 PM
sounds to me like something might be in motion
RockStar36
01-05-2010, 01:08 PM
or at best he regurgitates what has already been passsed around.

He did howver tell us that Cowher was not "there" today.. what that exactly means was completely up to translation

I know I read it earlier, but I'm having trouble finding that particular post right now.

However, if I remember correctly, it said "that I've been told" which was basically saying that he knew nothing except Cowher wasn't staring him in the face.