MATT LIGHT

[NOT THE DUDE...]

he is only 31 and he could last us 3 or 4 years. i say we could probably get him for a 4th rd pick? this way we can draft clausen...

[realdealryan]

Re: MATT LIGHT

He's struggled at times over the last couple of years.

Cross your fingers that Charlie Johnson is available in some way, shape, or form.

[kernowboy]

Re: MATT LIGHT

he is only 31 and he could last us 3 or 4 years. i say we could probably get him for a 4th rd pick? this way we can draft clausen...

And that's the worry .... we might be daft enough to draft Clausen.

Bradford might be just about palatable, but Clausen is way over rated

[Ickybaluky]

Re: MATT LIGHT

Why would the Pats trade their starting LT, especially considering his salary is affordable ($4.5M), for a 4th round pick?

I think the Pats really like their tackles. Matt Light at LT, Vollmer at RT. Kaczur can move to guard (Stephen Neal is a FA, and is talking retirement after battling injuries the last few years) and Mark Levoir is the swing tackle. I don't think they want to create holes, considering they have others to fill.

[mayotm]

Re: MATT LIGHT

Why would the Pats trade their starting LT, especially considering his salary is affordable ($4.5M), for a 4th round pick?

I think the Pats really like their tackles. Matt Light at LT, Vollmer at RT. Kaczur can move to guard (Stephen Neal is a FA, and is talking retirement after battling injuries the last few years) and Mark Levoir is the swing tackle. I don't think they want to create holes, considering they have others to fill.

It's the time of year where chat room GM's excel. The why don't we trade for "______" are some of my favorites. They rank right up there with "we should trade down". Great ideas in theory, unfortunately, you have to have willing partners.

[WeAreArthurMoates]

Re: MATT LIGHT

Why would the Pats trade their starting LT, especially considering his salary is affordable ($4.5M), for a 4th round pick?

I think the Pats really like their tackles. Matt Light at LT, Vollmer at RT. Kaczur can move to guard (Stephen Neal is a FA, and is talking retirement after battling injuries the last few years) and Mark Levoir is the swing tackle. I don't think they want to create holes, considering they have others to fill.

There not only willing to trade him, they could end up cutting cause of Vollmer. You should no more than any of us how the Pansy's roll.

[realdealryan]

Re: MATT LIGHT

There not only willing to trade him, they could end up cutting cause of Vollmer. You should no more than any of us how the Pansy's roll.

I don't no if there gunna trade im if Vollmer iz RT.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: MATT LIGHT

Is there any substance to this? Do the Pats want to trade Light?

[hydro]

Re: MATT LIGHT

Is there any substance to this? Do the Pats want to trade Light?

Just throwing **** at the wall. This one has no chance of ever sticking though.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: MATT LIGHT

Maybe the Pats can package Brady, Moss and Light for our 1st round pick!

[OpIv37]

Re: MATT LIGHT

yeah, let's trade draft picks to the Pats..... that'll never come back to bite us

[NOT THE DUDE...]

Re: MATT LIGHT

Vollmer is their new starting rt, they have no room for light. they need to resign mankins and wilfork.... so they will be looking to trade light...

[NOT THE DUDE...]

Re: MATT LIGHT

excuse me vollmer is their new starting lt...

[PECKERWOOD]

Re: MATT LIGHT

And that's the worry .... we might be daft enough to draft Clausen.

Bradford might be just about palatable, but Clausen is way over rated

You got it backwards, it's Bradford who has the most concerns with being fragile and previous injuries, plus at least Clausen played in a pro offense.

[Oldbillsfan]

Re: MATT LIGHT

If the Pats want to trade with you, they are coming out on top. Just don't ask Al Davis.