Del Rio not high on Garrard

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Beebe's Kid
    Registered User
    • Nov 2009
    • 3134

    Del Rio not high on Garrard

    I thought this was interesting. I think Garrard looked very good, in my limited exposure to him this year.

    He is a guy that is not afraid to throw the football, seems to have good arm strength, and is mobile.

    What do you think?

    Link

  • ddaryl
    Everything I post is sexual inuendo
    • Jan 2005
    • 10714

    #2
    Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

    there are some rumors about the Bills making a play of course...

    Is he a worthy stop gap QB for us ?

    Comment

    • Ron Burgundy
      Registered User
      • Nov 2005
      • 3154

      #3
      Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

      Sure, I'd take Garrard (and several other QBs) over the guys on the current roster, though McNabb is a nicest viable daydream.

      Like most mid-level starters, he'd be fine with an improvement in our o-line and a continued commitment to the running game.

      Comment

      • Beebe's Kid
        Registered User
        • Nov 2009
        • 3134

        #4
        Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

        Stop gap, or an actual QB? I think he might be just about perfect for Chan.

        I think he is extremely talented, and seems to really be coming into his own.

        I, admittedly, am far from the authority on the guy, so was wondering what people who have seen him play, more than myself, think about his ability.

        Comment

        • elltrain22
          Registered User
          • Sep 2003
          • 4281

          #5
          Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

          What in the heck does "stop gap QB" mean???
          If you walk with Jesus today, you don't have anything to worry about tomorrow...

          Comment

          • EDS
            Registered User
            • Jan 2003
            • 5216

            #6
            Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

            The people in Jacksonville don't think Gerrard has the dedication and committment to maximize his talents. Not sure that sounds like a guy I would want to pay alot of money to.

            Comment

            • Beebe's Kid
              Registered User
              • Nov 2009
              • 3134

              #7
              Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

              Originally posted by elltrain22
              What in the heck does "stop gap QB" mean???
              Stop gap means....good enough until we get some one better, I guess.

              If there really is such a critter, it has to be a Pennington type guy. Garrard should only be brought in if Chan/Nix think he has what it takes to be a franchise QB.

              As far as what the people of Jacksonville think about DG...does anybody that acutally watches football have an opinion on him? Just kidding...kind of.

              Comment

              • ddaryl
                Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                • Jan 2005
                • 10714

                #8
                Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

                Originally posted by elltrain22
                What in the heck does "stop gap QB" mean???
                a temporary Vet QB to play while we groom a rookie or whomever and improve the lines

                Comment

                • Griff
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 8154

                  #9
                  Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

                  This might actually be a better option than McNabb. While McNabb is no doubt better, he's injury prone, and will probably be more expensive to acquire.

                  Comment

                  • justasportsfan
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 71601

                    #10
                    Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

                    I'll take him over Vick.
                    sacrifice1
                    https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                    Comment

                    • Don't Panic
                      All-Pro Zoner
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 4227

                      #11
                      Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

                      Originally posted by EDS
                      The people in Jacksonville don't think Gerrard has the dedication and committment to maximize his talents. Not sure that sounds like a guy I would want to pay alot of money to.
                      That's saying a lot from the people of Jacksonville, who don't have the dedication or commitment to support their own team.

                      He would fit Gailey's system really well and I don't see him ever playing to the level where we need to spend top 10 money on him. I would definitely make the call to look into what it would take to get him.

                      Comment

                      • Michael82
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 82328

                        #12
                        Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

                        I'd be interested in David Garrard. He's not great, but he would come cheaper than McNabb and might do better under Gailey. Plus...didn't he go to the Pro Bowl this year?

                        Comment

                        • ddaryl
                          Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                          • Jan 2005
                          • 10714

                          #13
                          Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

                          Originally posted by justasportsfan
                          I'll take him over Vick.
                          I'd take the worlds fatest man as our QB over Vick

                          Comment

                          • Night Train
                            Retired - On Several Levels
                            • Jul 2005
                            • 33117

                            #14
                            Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

                            I'd take him until someone better comes along.

                            He's not bad at all.
                            Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

                            Comment

                            • Syderick
                              Registered User
                              • Apr 2006
                              • 1466

                              #15
                              Re: Del Rio not high on Garrard

                              He'd be a good QB to get. He get's the job done.
                              3,000,000th post on BZ!










                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X