If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Washington D.C. Talk radio Campell and unnamed for Whitner.
Washington D.C. Talk radio Campell and unnamed for Whitner.
They were talking about this today on talk radio here in D.C. They said there are rumors of a trade getting done sending Campbell and another unnamed to Buffalo in return of Whitner....
Speculation of course...but I think I'd be down for this.....how about you guys?
Re: Washington D.C. Talk radio Campell and unnamed for Whitner.
In a heartbeat!
I would think we would have had to pair a draft pick or player with Donte to get Campbell, not the other way around haha.
If we had Campbell we could basically take QB off the list of draft needs, allowing us to take an OT (Saffold?) within the first 4 rounds while beefing up the defense with the other picks.
Re: Washington D.C. Talk radio Campell and unnamed for Whitner.
Campbell is just another Byron Leftwhich IMO. I'd rather have a competition between a draft pick/FA pickup and the other 3 QB's for this season, then go out and get our guy.
Re: Washington D.C. Talk radio Campell and unnamed for Whitner.
Originally posted by T-Long
Campbell is just another Byron Leftwhich IMO. I'd rather have a competition between a draft pick/FA pickup and the other 3 QB's for this season, then go out and get our guy.
I'd rather have Tyler Thigpen to be quite honest.
Washington's offensive line is a collection of players past their prime and busts.
Mike Williams notched 8 starts, that should be a decent gauge of their awfulness.
Campbell has progressed every year he's been the starter, with his QB rating steadily rising from 77.6 in 07, 84.3 in 08, and 86.4 in 09. His TDs and completion % have gone up every season as well. I know those numbers don't tell the whole story, but he's had Randle El and S. Moss on the back end of their careers.
Re: Washington D.C. Talk radio Campell and unnamed for Whitner.
I personally feel that Campbell got shafted in Washington because the Redskins had no offensive plan or identity (they go through OCs like we do and bringing in a guy doing Bingo actually improved their playcalling) and they surrounded him with little offensive talent. The Redskins treated him like we have our young QBs, except that Campbell put up pretty decent numbers and wasn't completely horrible given the situation.
Is Campbell a stud? I have no idea. I'd like to see guys like him and Trent get an actual long-term offensive plan. Campbell is better than what we currently have and Whitner is semi-expendable so that would be a good deal. I think it's unlikely to happen however.
__________________
God give me style and give me grace
God put a smile upon my face
Re: Washington D.C. Talk radio Campell and unnamed for Whitner.
Originally posted by Beebe's Kid
Yeah really! A high completion percentage, all those yards, and the TD's....they all came against Navy, Army, and Ball State.
What the **** does that mean? Garbage stats? Didn't he play in the NFC East this year?
That means when they are down 3 td's in a second half the opposing defense backs off. You didn't watch the Skins much I see. I repeat, Campbell sucks and we might as well go with Brohm to see what he has.
Comment