With TO and Reed gone

[X-Era]

I think Dez Bryant is a real possibility at 9.

I also did some reading on Gailey's "pistol" offense in KC.

Its basically a spread, except the QB lines up 3 yards deep instead of a full shotgun. I can utilize 2 TE's that can stretch the field.

I think this may explain discussions with Gresham and Hernandez, and it may open us up to QB's that have run the spread like LeFevour, Clausen, and... Tebow.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_offense

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article-1/Around-the-Combine-Day-1/68ef2f76-b820-4586-a2a0-1cbc0a30fb07

[YardRat]

If all of the big guys are gone before us and Bryant is still on the board, it would be tough to pass on him.

[BuffaloBlitz83]

I rather snag Spiller than Dez

[JCBills]

The Pistol was one package they employed, and was used to better fit what he had available. Everywhere he's been his offense has adjusted to the players, from the spread to a power run game. Not saying we couldn't see it though.

[T-Long]

I think Dez Bryant is a real possibility at 9.

I also did some reading on Gailey's "pistol" offense in KC.

Its basically a spread, except the QB lines up 3 yards deep instead of a full shotgun. I can utilize 2 TE's that can stretch the field.

I think this may explain discussions with Gresham and Hernandez, and it may open us up to QB's that have run the spread like LeFevour, Clausen, and... Tebow.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_offense

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article-1/Around-the-Combine-Day-1/68ef2f76-b820-4586-a2a0-1cbc0a30fb07

I think the pick with be a LT or Clausen IMO. I think Bryant will be a stud in this league, but I just can't see them doing that.

And by the way, I love the new avatar. Sid the Kid baby!! (even though I wanted USA to win, I have no problem with the Kid getting the goal in the end. I smell a REPEAT)

[Yasgur's Farm]

I say we go BPA within our group of needs... QB, OT, WR, NT, DE, LB, TE.

WR has become as big of a need as anything else at this point... I think Dez will be our pick at #9.

[Nighthawk]

I do not see this happening...

[DrGraves]

X-Era someone puked where your avatar is suppose to be.

[tampabay25690]

I rather snag Spiller than Dez

And we need a RB in round 1?

[X-Era]

X-Era someone puked where your avatar is suppose to be.

Thats what happens when you lose a bet.

[jdbillsfan]

I would not be happy with Dez. He seems like a pain.

I like the WR from GT better and could possibly be had in the 2nd.

[BuffaloBlitz83]

And we need a RB in round 1?

We don't need 1 but he is a game changer and those type of players can help your offense. Takes a lot of pressure off the QB. You can easily move Lynch or Jackson. Neither back has the potential of Spiller and at 9 he could be the BPA. I know we have a larger need for a LT. And I wouldn't be mad if we took that LT but I'd prefer Spiller to drafting Dez, Mcclain, or Claussen. Spiller will have a huge year next year.

[tampabay25690]

We don't need 1 but he is a game changer and those type of players can help your offense. Takes a lot of pressure off the QB. You can easily move Lynch or Jackson. Neither back has the potential of Spiller and at 9 he could be the BPA. I know we have a larger need for a LT. And I wouldn't be mad if we took that LT but I'd prefer Spiller to drafting Dez, Mcclain, or Claussen. Spiller will have a huge year next year.

I would almost put my paycheck on it that we wont draft Spiller.

[BuffaloBlitz83]

I would almost put my paycheck on it that we wont draft Spiller.

I never said I was expecting the pick. I only said I'd like it. A big Ole LT would be fine for me. I'll just be annoyed if it's Claussen

[CoolBreeze]

Another Marshawn Lynch, only not likeable.... No thank you:shelby:

[feldspar]

Yeah, we should go WR at #1, then maybe we can turn into the next Detroit Lions. They took a wide receiver as their #1 pick 4 out of 5 years (all in the top 10) on their way to 0-16:

2003: Charles Rogers - 2nd overall
2004: Roy Williams - 7th overall
2005: Mike Williams - 10th overall
2007: Calvin Johnson - 2nd overall

2008: 0-16

You don't build your team around wide receivers. We need help on both lines, a QB, then maybe head for LB and such.

If the Bills take a receiver at #9, I'm going to turn in my badge and gun. I quit. How entirely stupid would that be if we have a line that can't block for the guy that can't throw the football to our #9 pick?

As you can see, I'm pretty much against the idea.

If you don't think that this can get any worse, stick around and pick a WR at #9. It can get a lot worse, and I've seen it.