No NT?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Don't Panic
    All-Pro Zoner
    • Dec 2005
    • 4227

    No NT?

    A few things about the Edwards addition...

    I think he will start and be a 2 down player at least. He is definitely not a NT, so it seems like we won't be running a traditional 3-4. If that's the case, expect to see each DL responsible for only one gap. That means that our MLBs will have to handle holes in the middle against the run, and our OLBs will have to provide most if not all of the pressure against the pass.

    In and of itself, this isn't such a bad thing. But it does mean a few things, namely...

    1. We will most likely not be looking at Dan Williams any more. We may look at a DT, or more specifically a NT, but I can't imagine it will be in round one. Not with LT being such a pressing need that has yet to be addressed.

    2. Our LBs better be playing at a high level. If not, QBs are going to have all day and the middle of our front seven is going to get torn up for huge rushing gains.

    3. As a result, LB might be more of a priority now. A lot of this will depend on Schobel's decision, but I wouldn't be surprised to see us go LB in the first or second round either way. We are going to have to have at least six guys with a strength in at least one area who can be on the field at any given time if this defense is going to be respectable.

    All in all, I like the fixes, especially given the atmosphere in the market these days. We'll see if the Bills decide to get involved in the RFA market and tackle some of these needs before the draft.
  • HAMMER
    I'm right, Miyagi is wrong.
    • Jul 2003
    • 8132

    #2
    Re: No NT?

    I believe he was brought in to play DE, why would you assume this would indicate an intention to play something other than a 3-4?

    Comment

    • Night Train
      Retired - On Several Levels
      • Jul 2005
      • 33117

      #3
      Re: No NT?

      The Bills are still looking for a NT in FA or certainly within the first 2-3 rounds of the draft. They need at least 2 more before camp.
      Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

      Comment

      • Don't Panic
        All-Pro Zoner
        • Dec 2005
        • 4227

        #4
        Re: No NT?

        The assumption isn't that we aren't running a traditional 3-4, it's that we're running something more like what Dallas runs, which doesn't require a two gap NT. It's still a 3-4 though. I was under the impression he was here to play DT. Is that wrong? If so, forgive me... what I read thus far was that he was here to play DT.

        Comment

        • psubills62
          Legendary Zoner
          • Sep 2008
          • 11295

          #5
          Re: No NT?

          Originally posted by Don't Panic
          The assumption isn't that we aren't running a traditional 3-4, it's that we're running something more like what Dallas runs, which doesn't require a two gap NT. It's still a 3-4 though. I was under the impression he was here to play DT. Is that wrong? If so, forgive me... what I read thus far was that he was here to play DT.
          I think Dwan Edwards is here to play DE, but could kick inside to NT on passing downs. I'm pretty sure we're going to go with the traditional 2-gap system.
          "Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
          - Nicholas Cummings

          Comment

          • TigerJ
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 22575

            #6
            Re: No NT?

            I've read nothing to suggest Dwan Edwards will do anything besides playing defensive end. If anything, I could see Marcus Stroud playing a down here or there at DT, even though I think he'll be more suited to DE too. I think the Bills will at least try Kyle Williams at NT. I agree that it's a little more likely that the Bills go left tackle at #9. They still have a chance to get Cody in round two. If not Cody, Cam Thomas should be available.
            I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

            I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

            Comment

            • T-Long
              Circling the Wagons since 1982.
              • Sep 2003
              • 3848

              #7
              Re: No NT?

              This really means nothing, but thought it was interesting. On Madden, he is a 75 rating as a DE, an 80 as a DT in the 3-4. Hmmm...

              Comment

              • NOT THE DUDE...
                Formerly MARCELL DAREUS POWER, now posting as DANNY BATTEN POWER
                • Jan 2010
                • 8826

                #8
                Re: No NT?

                The bills will draft a top nt in round 1 or round 2. mark it down.

                terrence cody!

                Comment

                • Don't Panic
                  All-Pro Zoner
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 4227

                  #9
                  Re: No NT?

                  Originally posted by T-Long
                  This really means nothing, but thought it was interesting. On Madden, he is a 75 rating as a DE, an 80 as a DT in the 3-4. Hmmm...
                  That was my source... thanks T-Long.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X