TOP 5 REASONS WHY WE' WON'T DRAFT CLAUSEN
Collapse
X
-
Re: TOP 5 REASONS WHY WE' WON'T DRAFT CLAUSEN
Originally posted by better daysReason #1 He is not on the board at the #9 pick. (I HOPE).
I don't care how many fanboys would cry. He's not worth a top 10 pick.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
-
👍 4
Comment
-
-
Re: TOP 5 REASONS WHY WE' WON'T DRAFT CLAUSEN
Originally posted by Night TrainI'd love it if he was and the Bills accepted a trade for him, picking up extra picks.
I don't care how many fanboys would cry. He's not worth a top 10 pick.
Comment
-
-
Re: TOP 5 REASONS WHY WE' WON'T DRAFT CLAUSEN
Originally posted by better daysI could live with a trade down if it was not too far & they picked up an extra 2nd or 3rd rnd pick that would be sweet.
with extra picks coming... How could that NOT be better than reaching for Clausen ?Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: TOP 5 REASONS WHY WE' WON'T DRAFT CLAUSEN
Other than that, I agree...........fix the lines, beef up the new defense, and draft a young QB in the later rds. Then in the 2011 draft, we could in a better position to find the "franchise QB" via trade, FA, or draft
Comment
-
-
Re: TOP 5 REASONS WHY WE' WON'T DRAFT CLAUSEN
that was like reading one of yordad's posts. Licking on Lossman and hating on Edwards.Originally posted by yordadChrist, you are the queerest person in the history of Bills fanhood. I swear to god I would stomp you.
Comment
-
-
Re: TOP 5 REASONS WHY WE' WON'T DRAFT CLAUSEN
Originally posted by clumping plateletsHe's wrong about this, 2/3 of the teams in the NFL used "cash-to-cap"
you knew he was wrong when he says "trust me."Originally posted by yordadChrist, you are the queerest person in the history of Bills fanhood. I swear to god I would stomp you.
Comment
-
-
Re: TOP 5 REASONS WHY WE' WON'T DRAFT CLAUSEN
Originally posted by PECKERWOODOne more thing, these "QBs can't be successful if they're on their back" type of arguments need to stop because we could always trade back up for a left tackle, I mean this is a deep class after all.
Secondly, trading up will cost us picks which is something we can ill afford with our needs on both offence and defence.
Thirdly whilst it is a deep class, it could be a similar draft to 2008, when eight OTs went in Round 1 alone. After that, the next pick was John Greco and no-one can consider him starting material.
Fans mention the likes of Saffold, and Veldheer but as they do well at their Pro Days, they climb.
By the time we draft at No41, there is at least the chance that at least 15 potential selections could go on an OT, and if the likes of Detroit, Kanasas City, Washington, and Oakland all with legitimate needs picking in Round2 ahead of us.
In Round1, Detroit, Washington, Kansas City, Seattle, Oakland, San Francisco, Pittsburgh, Green Bay, Arizona, Dallas and Indianapolis all have OT needs to a certain extent.
What must be stopped is the delusion we can easily getting a starting LT at No41 - yes the draft is deep, but its not that deep.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
Comment