Gaither for a 2nd?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Gaither for a 2nd?
The Bills need a LT desperately. I can't stomach another Mike Williams if they take a tackle with #9 and he doesn't pan out. At 24 years old (according to Ravens' website,) he's young enough to have a bright future but already has some NFL experience. I'd try to talk them down to maybe a third and Whitner, since Ed Reed is good enough to make up for Whitner blowing coverages and missing tackles.
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Gaither for a 2nd?
Originally posted by JOHN DELLAPELLEi dont know, ive heard he has commitment issues... and that he doesnt really love football... the bills would have to talk to him before they trade for him....
As to the original poster, I would give up our second for Gaither in a heart beat and pray that we do.I am The Batman.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Gaither for a 2nd?
A solid, proven LT that paved the way for Ray Rice and was part of a solid o-line? I'd do it in a heartbeat. Would be better than Trent, Davis, or Campbell in my opinion.DRAFT WISHLIST
1) BRYAN BULAGA - OT/IOWA
2) JONATHON DWYER - RB/GA TECH
3) JASON WORILDS - OLB/ VA. TECH
4) TORRELL TROUP - NT/CENTRAL FLORIDA
Comment
-
-
Re: Gaither for a 2nd?
Originally posted by JOHN DELLAPELLEi dont know, ive heard he has commitment issues... and that he doesnt really love football... the bills would have to talk to him before they trade for him....
Comment
-
-
Re: Gaither for a 2nd?
On the surface, it certainly makes sense. The problem is, there must be some underlying reason, why the Ravens are prepared to deal a young guy, who played pretty well last year, at a position as highly valued generally, as OT is.
I don't know what that reason is, but without knowing, I'm not going to pull the trigger.
While the Ravens could well see Oher as their future LT, I'm not so sure that should be making Gaither automatically 'expendable'. There's something slightly odd about it that says a lot of 'due diligence' could be needed.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Gaither for a 2nd?
Originally posted by BuddoOn the surface, it certainly makes sense. The problem is, there must be some underlying reason, why the Ravens are prepared to deal a young guy, who played pretty well last year, at a position as highly valued generally, as OT is.
I don't know what that reason is, but without knowing, I'm not going to pull the trigger.
While the Ravens could well see Oher as their future LT, I'm not so sure that should be making Gaither automatically 'expendable'. There's something slightly odd about it that says a lot of 'due diligence' could be needed.
Who gives away starting LT's and why hasn't anyone tried to aquire him yet ? Something isn't right here.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
-
👍 1
Comment
-
Comment