Rams release Marc Bulger today

[Ickybaluky]

Don't have a link yet, but will soon.

Seems like him might be an option for a team like Buffalo who wants to bring in another QB. Bulger might be used up, because he has been breaking down physically, but he is out there for anyone to sign.

[The Spaz]

No arm and no thanks.

[T-Long]

hell, I'd rather have Campbell..and that is saying something

[patmoran2006]

My opinion on him is "meh".

But I think this is a very obvious move that they're locked in at Bradford at #1

[trapezeus]

i'm saying this more just to be the guy who says this, "bring him in."

in reality, i wouldn't want bulger anymore than i would want a triple concussed Trent Green.

Bulger needs to retire. i don't think he has anything left in the tank

[Mr. Miyagi]

I honestly thought he was cut months ago.

[Mr. Miyagi]

Not much of a smokescreen for Bradford going #1 is it?

[TacklingDummy]

Bulger has 300 yard passing games, three 20+ TD passing seasons. Since that qualifies someone as being good, he's better than Campbell so bring Bulger in. He'll cost nothing.

[djjimkelly]

i think hes a much better option then campbell that being said i dont like either one.

but would much rather have bulger. he has had no weapons for 2 years in st louis besides stephen jackson

[SirMcGee]

hell, I'd rather have Campbell..and that is saying something

I'd rather start Edwards over both these guys.

[X-Era]

My opinion on him is "meh".

But I think this is a very obvious move that they're locked in at Bradford at #1

If they don't take Bradford, and I agree its likely, all hell will break lose in the top of round 1.

BTW, no interest in Bulger.

[Scumbag College]

i'm saying this more just to be the guy who says this, "bring him in."


D'oh, beat me to it.

Bring him in!

[Mr Bills]

i thought he was going to retire? right now he is no better than edwards. injury prone and hasnt been the same since 06. I actually take fitzpatrick over him as well. he is DONE.

[Don't Panic]

If we didn't have Fitz, Bulger would be a great add. He could be an insurance policy should Trent not prove to be able to get it done again.

[yomommabilly]

Bulgers last good season was in 2006. The next spring he signed his 65 million dollar contract extension and from that point forward, he went into the tank. The guy cannot move, he locks onto only one receiver and his best move is the tuck, bend and drop manuever. Half the sacks in 2007-2008 and 2009 were solely on Bulgers back. The man had many oportunities on broken plays to throw the ball away but instead took a sack. St. Louis area people starting getting smart when they realized the above. They guy is washed up as a starter. Backup ? Meh, maybe but I would not trust him in there.

Add to that fact, St. Louis has not really had any receivers to speak of. Again, 2006 was the last year Isaac Bruce and Torry Holt were even closely related to being productive. Just the same, he had those two to throw to albeit they were all short sideline routes. They cut Bruce after 2007 and cut Holt after 2008 and have brought in basically no one that is able to catch a footballl. Does not change the fact that Bulger plain ol suuuuucks.

[yomommabilly]

i thought he was going to retire? right now he is no better than edwards. injury prone and hasnt been the same since 06. I actually take fitzpatrick over him as well. he is DONE.

The guy cannot play in a dome, what do you think he will do outside in the wind and cold ? Answer, take a sack or throw many interceptions.

[yomommabilly]

If we didn't have Fitz, Bulger would be a great add. He could be an insurance policy should Trent not prove to be able to get it done again.

Sorry, meant to tack the part about stinking it up in a dome and will be worse outside , to this post. Sorry.

[yomommabilly]

Anyone thats thinking of Bulger had better jump over to the boards at the St. Louis Post dispatch. The majority of the people are throwing block parties in honor of Bulger leaving. Honest folks, the Rams were not the best but this guy stinks up a football field, fast.

[TrEd FTW]

To anyone who might want Bulger here: Just take a look at his career stats outside a dome, and you won't anymore.

[TacklingDummy]

What's 20-32?

[Ingtar33]

Don't have a link yet, but will soon.

Seems like him might be an option for a team like Buffalo who wants to bring in another QB. Bulger might be used up, because he has been breaking down physically, but he is out there for anyone to sign.


which guarantees Bradford going no.1

[ChristopherWalken]

Bulger requires more of an offensive line than what the Bills have to give. Considering Gailey's type offense and the state of this line, Bulger shouldn't be high on the list.

[jamze132]

Not much of a smokescreen for Bradford going #1 is it?
Cutting Bulger had nothing to do with a smokescreen. They were going to draft Bradford regardless. They cut Bulger to avoid paying him $8.5m.