Tweet
Attention, he is no Adrian Peterson!!!!! He may not even be better then Frd Jackson.
You CANNOT make this pick at #9 if you are the Bills. He is a luxury pick.
You CANNOT make this pick at #9 if you are the Bills. He is a luxury pick.
-
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
Adrian Peterson isn't even Adrian PetersonI remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?"
"Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet.
You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times."
It was all true what he was saying. And yet, I thought something is brewing inside the head of this Coach.
He sees something in me, some kind of raw talent that he can mold. But that's when I felt the handcuffs go on.
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
He's far faster than Fred Jackson and he's also an amazing receiver & kick returner. The most electric offensive player in the draft.
Fred Jackson turns 30 soon and Lynch may be leaving.
He's not my 1st choice but the guy is instant offense and would open things up for other skill players.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for witComment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
unless of course the following are all gone:
Okung, Suh, McCoy, Bradford, T. Williams, Bulaga, D. Williams, McClain, Morgan are all gone.Last edited by Kenny; 04-16-2010, 12:33 PM.Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
Although I've not been in favor of drafting Spiller at #9, the more I hear about him and the more I think about it, the more I'm open to it. He is a playmaker and we need those types desperately on this team.Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
Spiller at #9
Tebow at #41
Brandon Spikes with whatever pick we get for ThugMode
Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
I know the Bills have more pressing needs than RB but if the top LTs are gone I am not opposed to bringing in the best RB the Bills have had since Thurman donned the Bills uniform.Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
I think 9 is too high but I wouldn't cringe if we took him.
We need a running game to keep the offenses off the field especially with the jets taking Holmes and the fins taking Marshall while trying to develop a qb at the same time.
With Lynch most likely gone, we'll need more than Fred Jackson.
I would also rather have McKelvin concentrate on being a cb and let Spiller take the kick returns.Last edited by justasportsfan; 04-16-2010, 12:41 PM.Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
the Bills will trade #9 before they draft Spiller IMHO
Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
Sorry we were a 6-10 team, there are no luxury picks on a team like us.Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
I'm not opposed to Spiller at 9 at all. I'm a firm believer that our first pick will be a home run hitter on offense. Whether they think thats Spiler or Bryant I don't know. But lets be honest, The offense is absolutely horrible at putting points on the board and eating up time. Spiller would be a great fix for that problem and leaves our defense with a little more time to recover instead of constant three and outs.Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
Let me preface this my saying LT is a bigger need than RB but RB is a bigger need than most people believe. Freddy is almost 30 years old. Marshawn wants out of Buffalo and played like it last year. His heart will be in it less this year. If Marshawn played he is capable andwould mature then the RB position would not be a need but at its current state it definitely is a need.Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
I'm all for Spiller. He is a dynamic play maker.Comment
-
Re: The just say "NO!" to CJ Spiller at #9 thread!!!
If top three OT are not there then i am all for getting him. i want to improve the OLINE or DLINE but a talent like that can go a long way. i want OT but if there gone i can live with spiller or clauson
MUCK
FIAMIComment
Comment