Golden Tate?

[casdhf]

If he's there at our pick, do we take him?

[THATHURMANATOR]

Re: Golden Tate?

No.

[The Spaz]

Re: Golden Tate?

No.

[THATHURMANATOR]

Re: Golden Tate?

maybe...

[THATHURMANATOR]

Re: Golden Tate?

I don't know!!!!!!

[Mr. Miyagi]

Re: Golden Tate?

Too early. No.

[Jaybird]

Re: Golden Tate?

We do need a Wr and I tyhink Tate has tons of talent, but we might need someone more physical.. and maybe a LT or NT should BE the Second round pick

[ddaryl]

Re: Golden Tate?

LOL!... that would be an insult to this franchise.

We didn't need a RB but took the BPA, and now we have holes that MUST be filled with a 2nd round player and the rest of the draft.

I don't want to see a single pick on any positon today outside of OL DL or LB

[tampabay25690]

Re: Golden Tate?

I think he goes to St Louis a weapon for Bradford for years to come....
Maybe..

I dont see us getting him though...

[casdhf]

Re: Golden Tate?

I would not be against this pick at all.

[THATHURMANATOR]

Re: Golden Tate?

He reminds me too much of Josh reed. I say No way JOSE..

[Tatonka]

Re: Golden Tate?

we could.. but i dont see any way that he is the best available at our pick.. i think we are assured of there being one very good LT and possibly the qb they want at that spot.

[psubills62]

Re: Golden Tate?

Golden Tate? Depends on who else is there. If 4 OT's, 1+ NT's, etc. are all off the board, I wouldn't mind taking Tate.

WR is a need, and he's an explosive, dominant player. He literally took over games for ND, and I think that's the kind of guy we need.

[Mahdi]

Re: Golden Tate?

If he's there at our pick, do we take him?

ha. I think Spiller can do many of the things Tate can but better. So no.

[Mahdi]

Re: Golden Tate?

Sergio Kindle at 41 would be interesting.