If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
I do not think the Bills deserve a higher grade than the Patriots after what they did (in getting a bunch of players and more draft picks)
I also don't believe in grades period until a few years after the draft. But still
And I think your wrong about grades as they are not meant to show or perdict anything about how a player will do in the future.
Why do you think the Pats drafted better? They added great depth but not great starters. Of all their picks how many wil start? 1 maybe 2 barring injuries.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
And I think your wrong about grades as they are not meant to show or perdict anything about how a player will do in the future.
Why do you think the Pats drafted better? They added great depth but not great starters. Of all their picks how many wil start? 1 maybe 2 barring injuries.
They're the friggin Pats- how many starters did they actually need? They're not like Buffalo- they don't go into every draft in need of 7-8 starters.
They're the friggin Pats- how many starters did they actually need? They're not like Buffalo- they don't go into every draft in need of 7-8 starters.
Yes which is my point...Their draft gade gets hurt because they took guys that they wont use now.
Its the same principle as Pat will use in 3 years when he grades this draft;
Player A is a RB who went to a crap team and started Day 1, and has had 1000+ yard seasons.
Player B is alos a RB who went to the defending SB champs started as their #3 back, was #2 two years ago and is a one year starter.
Which player will get a higher grade? Players who are of good value and fill immediate needs for teams always get higher grades than teams that draft for depth.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Yes which is my point...Their draft gade gets hurt because they took guys that they wont use now.
Its the same principle as Pat will use in 3 years when he grades this draft;
Player A is a RB who went to a crap team and started Day 1, and has had 1000+ yard seasons.
Player B is alos a RB who went to the defending SB champs started as their #3 back, was #2 two years ago and is a one year starter.
Which player will get a higher grade? Players who are of good value and fill immediate needs for teams always get higher grades than teams that draft for depth.
I agree with you completely and it's funny that you (and your guys at Draft Nasty) gave them the same grade I did...an A-.
They're the friggin Pats- how many starters did they actually need? They're not like Buffalo- they don't go into every draft in need of 7-8 starters.
But there level of depth and the shuffling they've done over the years seems to be catching up to them... IMO they're moving backwards slowly
It almost appears The Patriots are more interested in more picks then the actual players. At some point they need to use those extra picks to move up and draft impact players
Comment